I Green's function boundary conditions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Green's identity to derive the potential in terms of the Green's function under specific boundary conditions. It highlights the necessity for the Green's function to satisfy certain conditions for Dirichlet and Neumann boundaries to simplify the integral expression for the potential. The query raised pertains to the mathematical justification for imposing these conditions on the Green's function without introducing inconsistencies. Reference to Jackson's text is made as a source of clarification on this topic. Understanding these requirements is crucial for ensuring the validity of the potential's representation.
deuteron
Messages
64
Reaction score
14
TL;DR
what is the motivation / justification behind the applied conditions on the Green's function for Dirichlet / Neumann boundary conditions
we know that, using the Green's identity ##\iiint\limits_V (\varphi \Delta\psi -\psi \Delta\varphi)\ dV =\iint_{\partial V} (\varphi \frac {\partial \psi}{\partial n}-\psi \frac {\partial\varphi}{\partial n})\ da## and substituting ##\varphi=\phi## and ##\psi=G## here, we can write the potential as:

$$\phi_{\vec r} = \iiint\limits_V \rho_{\vec r_q} G_{\vec r, \vec r_q}\ d^3r_q\ +\ \frac 1 {4\pi}\ [\iint _{\partial V} G_{\vec r, \vec r_q} \frac \partial {\partial n} \phi_{\vec r_q} - \phi_{\vec r_q} \frac{\partial G_{\vec r, \vec r_q}} {\partial n} \ da]$$

here, for the type of given boundary conditions, ( Dirichlet: ##\phi|_{\partial V}=\text{given}## or Neumann ##\frac {\partial \phi}{\partial n}|_{\partial V}=\text{given}##) we require, that the Green's function satisfies some conditions (Dirichlet: ##G|_{\partial V}=0##, Neumann: ##\frac {\partial G}{\partial n} |_{\partial V}=- \frac {4\pi}{\text{surface area of}\ \partial V}##)

I understand that these make our life easier when we substitute the Green's function into the above integral expression for ##\phi##
However, I am confused about *why* we are allowed to make these requirements on the Green's function. How are we mathematically sure that making this requirements would not cause a problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have found the answer in Jackson, section 1.10 page 18
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...

Similar threads