Green's function for Poisson Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Green's functions to solve the Poisson equation in both 2D and 3D contexts. Participants explore the validity of these solutions in finite domains and the implications of boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Green's function solutions for the Poisson equation in 2D and 3D, questioning their applicability in finite domains without boundary conditions.
  • Another participant suggests that the solutions can be used in finite domains without boundary conditions, noting that this leads to non-unique solutions due to the potential addition of Laplace equation solutions.
  • A third participant clarifies that these are "Free Space Green's Functions," valid for infinite domains, and discusses the construction of Dirichlet Green's Functions when boundary conditions are present.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty regarding the application of the integral solution in a 3D example, particularly when the source function is constant, and seeks clarification on potential issues.
  • Another participant recommends investigating the use of Fourier series for solutions in finite domains, especially when boundary conditions are involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Green's functions in finite domains and the role of boundary conditions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for such cases.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the domain size and the nature of the source function, as well as the implications of boundary conditions on the uniqueness of solutions.

bhatiaharsh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am working on finding a solution to Poisson equation through Green's function in both 2D and 3D. For the equation: [tex]\nabla^2 D = f[/tex], in 3D the solution is:
[tex]D(\mathbf x) = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_V \frac{f(\mathbf x')}{|\mathbf x - \mathbf x'|} d\mathbf{x}'[/tex], and in 2D the solution is:
[tex]D(\mathbf x) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_V \log(|\mathbf x - \mathbf x'|) f(\mathbf x') d\mathbf{x}'[/tex].

Now, my question is that where these solutions hold true only for infinite domains?

If I have a small rectangular domain, can I still use these equations to solve the Poisson's equation without any boundary conditions ?

Can someone help me with this, or point me to a reference which I should read ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you should be able to use these even on a finite domain provided that you have no boundary conditions on that domain, yes. What this means is your solution will not be unique--you could add a Laplace equation solution to it (which corresponds to the effects of sources lying outside your finite domain) without loss of generality.
 
These are what you call "Free Space Greens Functions" and are valid for infinite domains.
If you have a region without any boundary conditions then obviously these will still hold.

However, if you do have Boundary Conditions, you want to construct Dirichlet Greens Functions which are of the form G = H + G_f
where H is a harmonic function (i.e. solves laplace's equation) and G_f is the Free Space Green's Function.
Solving these problems is usually done using the method of images.
 
Thanks for the pointers. If I understand right, and am not worried about a unique solution I should be able to use the integral solution of the equation. I tried a simple example in 1D and 3D, but the 3D example doesn't work out fine, and I am not sure what the problem is.

In either case, the source function [itex]f[/itex] does not decay (is constant). Could this be a problem ?

I am attaching my two examples:
 

Attachments

As someone said before, this is the free space Greens function and the Greens function is highly dependent upon the domain, you can perhaps use the method of images to obtain an answer if you want, but if it is a finite domain then I would investigate the use of a Fourier series for part of your solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
990
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K