Ground State in Peskin and Schroeder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the importance of adding an infinitesimal imaginary part to time \( T \) in quantum field theory (QFT) as presented in Peskin and Schroeder (P&S). This adjustment, \( T \to T - i\epsilon \), is crucial for ensuring the correct behavior of propagators and the application of adiabatic switching in the LSZ reduction formalism. The participants clarify that while \( e^{-iE_n T} \) does not approach zero as \( T \to \infty \), the inclusion of the imaginary component leads to exponential decay, allowing for the dominance of the ground state term. The discussion also references the significance of renormalizing the Hamiltonian to set the ground state energy eigenvalue \( E_0 = 0 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian operators and energy eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of the LSZ reduction formalism in QFT
  • Basic concepts of complex analysis as applied to physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vacuum QFT and its implications in particle physics
  • Learn about adiabatic switching and its role in quantum field theory
  • Read Bjorken and Drell's second volume on quantum field theory, focusing on chapters 16 and 17
  • Explore the derivation and significance of the time-ordered free-field propagator in QFT
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in advanced topics in quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on the LSZ reduction and propagator calculations.

Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I am having a little confusion regarding the limit taken in Peskin and Schroeders quantum field theory book in ch. 4.
In P&S, it is shown that $$e^{-iHT}\ket{0}=e^{-iH_{0}T}\ket{\Omega}\bra{\Omega}\ket{0}+\sum_{n\neq 0}e^{-iE_nT}\ket{n}\bra{n}\ket{0}$$.
It is then claimed that by letting $$T\to (\infty(1-i\epsilon)) $$ that the other terms die off much quicker than $$e^{-iE_0T}$$, but my question is why is this the case? For example, why wouldn't the other terms also die off quicker if we simply sent $$T\to \infty$$ instead? Perhaps there is something about the limit of complex numbers I'm not understanding. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I think I figured it our. I mistakenly assumed the $$e^{-iE_n T}\to 0$$ as $$T\to \infty$$, but that is not the case, which is why the substitution is needed.
 
Yes, it's only the small imaginary term in T that leads to an e-x behavior. The real term just leads to oscillation.
 
It becomes much clearer by "renormalizing" the Hamiltonian such that ##E_0=0##, i.e., the ground state energy eigenvalue is set to 0 by shifting the total energy of the system (represented by the Hamilton operator) by adding a constant such that ##E_0=0##. Then all ##E_n>0##.

Now it is utmost important to add an infinitesimal imaginary part to ##T##, i.e., substituting ##T \rightarrow T-\mathrm{i} \epsilon##. This is crucial for all further developments of the theory to get the correct propagator (in vacuum QFT perturbation theory the time-ordered free-field propagator) and the correct "adiabatic switching" for the LSZ reduction. This is a pretty subtle point and should be very well studied!
 
vanhees71 said:
It becomes much clearer by "renormalizing" the Hamiltonian such that ##E_0=0##, i.e., the ground state energy eigenvalue is set to 0 by shifting the total energy of the system (represented by the Hamilton operator) by adding a constant such that ##E_0=0##. Then all ##E_n>0##.

Now it is utmost important to add an infinitesimal imaginary part to ##T##, i.e., substituting ##T \rightarrow T-\mathrm{i} \epsilon##. This is crucial for all further developments of the theory to get the correct propagator (in vacuum QFT perturbation theory the time-ordered free-field propagator) and the correct "adiabatic switching" for the LSZ reduction. This is a pretty subtle point and should be very well studied!

Can you perhaps say a bit more about vacuum QFT and adiabatic switching. Recently I saw these terms more frequently and would like to know more about them. Do you know a good reference to read about this subject?
 
That's one of the points which are very nicely and carefully presented in the classic textbook by Bjorken and Drell (of course the 2nd volume on quantum field theory; the 1st volume is not so much my favorite ;-)).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M91
Do you also happen to know which chapter? I think its either: chapter 16 Vacuum Expectation Values and S-Matrix or, chapter 17 Perturbation Theory
 
I'd say both chapters are worth to be carefully studied. It's a pretty concise formulation of LSZ reduction and the perturbative evaluation of the S-matrix elements.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M91

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
665
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K