Group Cohomology: Borel's Finite & Lie Group Cases

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter electroweak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Borel's results regarding the cohomology of compact Lie groups and finite groups, specifically stating that for a compact Lie group with real coefficients, all odd cohomology vanishes: H^odd(BG; R) = 0. For finite groups, it is established that all cohomology is finite: H(BG; R) = 0. The argument utilizes the Leray-Serre spectral sequence to relate the cohomology of the group G and the associated Eilenberg-MacLane space BG, demonstrating that H*(BG; Q) is a polynomial algebra with generators of even degree, which extends to real coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact Lie groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with cohomology theories, particularly in algebraic topology
  • Knowledge of spectral sequences, specifically the Leray-Serre spectral sequence
  • Basic concepts of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces and their significance in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Borel's theorem on the cohomology of compact Lie groups
  • Explore the Leray-Serre spectral sequence in detail and its applications in algebraic topology
  • Investigate the properties of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces K(G,1) and their role in cohomology
  • Examine the relationship between torsion in cohomology and its effects on algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, researchers in group theory, and students studying the cohomological properties of Lie and finite groups.

electroweak
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
In Dijkgraaf and Witten's paper "Topological Gauge Theory and Group Cohomology" it is claimed that...

For a compact Lie group we have the very useful property, due to Borel, that with real coefficients all odd cohomology vanishes: H^odd(BG; R) = 0. So the odd cohomology (and homology) consists completely of torsion. For finite groups an even stronger result holds: all cohomology is finite: H(BG; R) = 0.

Why are either of these statements (the Lie group case or the finite case) true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note: for discrete G, BG is the Eilenberg-Maclane space K(G,1). Perhaps this will help with the finite case.
 
One argument that works: Notice there is a fibration G→EG→BG so using the Leray-Serre spectral sequence given information about H*(G;Q) and H*(EG;Q) one can hopefully determine something about H*(BG;Q). Since EG is contractible this gives us one piece of the puzzle and since G has the homotopy type of a finite CW-complex with some difficulty one can actually show H*(G;Q) is an exterior algebra with generators of odd degree. Using our spectral sequence it then turns out H*(BG;Q) is a polynomial algebra with generators of even degree and the desired result follows. This might be overkill, but it works at least!

Edit: I wrote the above for coefficients in Q, but the same argument should work for R. Essentially the important fact is that over Q one can ignore torsion and the same obviously holds for R.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
963
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
638
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K