MHB Group Isomorphism: Proving G Is an Odd, Ablian Group

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Andrei1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Here is a problem from some russian book of algebra:
Suppose $$G$$ is a finite group. An automorphism $$\varphi$$ "operates" on this group. This automorphism satisfies the following two conditions: 1) $$\varphi^2=e_G$$; 2) if $$a\not= e$$, then $$\varphi(a)\not= a.$$ Prove that $$G$$ is an abelian odd group.

$$\varphi(x)=y\leftrightarrow\varphi(y)=x$$ and I know $$\varphi(e)=e.$$ I can see from this that $$G$$ is a group of odd order. How I prove commutativity? Do you think I can prove first that $$\varphi(a)=a^{-1}$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrei said:
Here is a problem from some russian book of algebra:$$\varphi(x)=y\leftrightarrow\varphi(y)=x$$ and I know $$\varphi(e)=e.$$ I can see from this that $$G$$ is a group of odd order. How I prove commutativity? Do you think I can prove first that $$\varphi(a)=a^{-1}$$?

as johng's post shows, the answer is yes.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
593
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top