- #1

pivoxa15

- 2,255

- 1

Let G be a group and H a subgroup of G.

The book claims HH=H because H is a subgroup.

Group multiplication is defined as AB={(a,b): a in A, b in B}

So HH should be ordered pairs with each pair containing two identical elements in H. But why is the answer H, which is not an ordered pair?

I think they have used this definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_of_subgroups instead of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_product_(group_theory)

Are the two completely different? The latter they direct product. If one write HH does it not refer to direct product? I always thought not putting a sign such as X means the same thing as putting X. Or is this convention only for elements of a group. So when doing operations on whole groups, putting or not putting a sign has different consequences?

The book claims HH=H because H is a subgroup.

Group multiplication is defined as AB={(a,b): a in A, b in B}

So HH should be ordered pairs with each pair containing two identical elements in H. But why is the answer H, which is not an ordered pair?

I think they have used this definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_of_subgroups instead of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_product_(group_theory)

Are the two completely different? The latter they direct product. If one write HH does it not refer to direct product? I always thought not putting a sign such as X means the same thing as putting X. Or is this convention only for elements of a group. So when doing operations on whole groups, putting or not putting a sign has different consequences?

Last edited by a moderator: