- #1
AndyUrquijo
- 20
- 0
Hi everyone,
I am studying the feasibility of using the collision of two beams to obtain nuclear fusion energy. I would like you to recommend me some serious and intersting articles about this. Is there any experiment that does fusion by beam collitions already?
Im open to hear about any theoretical and techonological issues you can think of. So far the principal problems seem to be the low event rate and the particle loss due to coulumbian scattering.
I don't think I understand the real problem with the event rates. With other parameters such as energy (or temperature) fixed, the event rate is heavily dependent on density, n2 for temperature based systems. So what is the diference between a Beam Collider (BC) and other devices? A physical one? Is the dependence on density different for this sytem? Or is there a techonological barrier in achievieng high beam densities?
I clearly understand the problem with scattered particles though. You lose more than 1000 particles per successful fusion*. This sucks, so you need to either reduce this loss or recover some of the scattered particles.
The only method I can think of to the first alternative is using muons. The problem is getting them of course. But supose you could obtain them somehow. Then in a D-T reaction aplying a muon beam to the deuterium or tritium beam (or both) would greatly reduce coulumbian interacions.
To "recover" some scattered particles, you could apply a magnetic field that rectified the path and the velocity. Most of the scattered particles would have small deviation angles and the velocities would only be affected by the small energy loss of brehmsstrahlung. So I would think without doing any calculation, that it is possible to recover a good amount of the lost particles. The recovered particles could then be used in the next collision cycle. And of course cyclic colliders are needed. this idea can't be aplied in linacs.
Resuming:
- Could you help me with material on the subject?
- Do BC for fusion exist already?
- Can you think of critical issues for this method?
- What do you think of my ideas? (Stupid? Awesome?)
*I read this here somewhere, but can't find it again to cite/link it.
I am studying the feasibility of using the collision of two beams to obtain nuclear fusion energy. I would like you to recommend me some serious and intersting articles about this. Is there any experiment that does fusion by beam collitions already?
Im open to hear about any theoretical and techonological issues you can think of. So far the principal problems seem to be the low event rate and the particle loss due to coulumbian scattering.
I don't think I understand the real problem with the event rates. With other parameters such as energy (or temperature) fixed, the event rate is heavily dependent on density, n2 for temperature based systems. So what is the diference between a Beam Collider (BC) and other devices? A physical one? Is the dependence on density different for this sytem? Or is there a techonological barrier in achievieng high beam densities?
I clearly understand the problem with scattered particles though. You lose more than 1000 particles per successful fusion*. This sucks, so you need to either reduce this loss or recover some of the scattered particles.
The only method I can think of to the first alternative is using muons. The problem is getting them of course. But supose you could obtain them somehow. Then in a D-T reaction aplying a muon beam to the deuterium or tritium beam (or both) would greatly reduce coulumbian interacions.
To "recover" some scattered particles, you could apply a magnetic field that rectified the path and the velocity. Most of the scattered particles would have small deviation angles and the velocities would only be affected by the small energy loss of brehmsstrahlung. So I would think without doing any calculation, that it is possible to recover a good amount of the lost particles. The recovered particles could then be used in the next collision cycle. And of course cyclic colliders are needed. this idea can't be aplied in linacs.
Resuming:
- Could you help me with material on the subject?
- Do BC for fusion exist already?
- Can you think of critical issues for this method?
- What do you think of my ideas? (Stupid? Awesome?)
*I read this here somewhere, but can't find it again to cite/link it.