Guarantee positiveness of an expression

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Siron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the expression $$\delta^2 = \frac{-\mu^2(5a\mu-4\mu^2-b)}{15a\mu-20\mu^2-3b}$$ is positive and well-defined, focusing on the parameters $a$ and $b$. Participants explore the implications of the numerator and denominator being quadratic expressions and the challenges of ensuring positivity independent of the variable $\mu$.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that the presence of $-\mu^2$ in the numerator complicates the guarantee of positivity for the entire expression.
  • It is noted that the numerator and denominator are both upside-down parabolas, leading to the conclusion that while the denominator can be controlled to remain negative, the numerator cannot be made positive everywhere.
  • One participant suggests that if $\mu$ can be restricted to a specific interval, it may be possible to find conditions on $a$ and $b$ that ensure the numerator is positive within that interval.
  • Another participant proposes that the conditions on $a$ and $b$ derived from the discriminant of the denominator may limit the flexibility in controlling the numerator's behavior.
  • Participants discuss the intersection of sets defined by inequalities involving $a$ and $b$, leading to potential solutions for the conditions required for positivity.
  • One participant summarizes the findings, stating that the conditions can be expressed as $a^2 < \frac{16}{15}b$ and provides a specific interval for $\mu$ that satisfies the derived inequalities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges posed by the quadratic nature of the expressions involved and the necessity of restricting $\mu$ to an interval to find suitable conditions on $a$ and $b$. However, there is no consensus on a definitive solution, as the discussion remains open to further exploration of the conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific interval for $\mu$ and the unresolved nature of how the conditions on $a$ and $b$ interact with the behavior of the numerator and denominator across different ranges of $\mu$.

Siron
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have the following expression:
$$\delta^2 = \frac{-\mu^2(5a\mu-4\mu^2-b)}{15a\mu-20\mu^2-3b}.$$
where $\mu \in \mathbb{R}$. Since $\delta^2$ is real (in the subject I'm working on) I need to check under which condition(s) the expression is well defined, that is, the RHS is positive and the denominator is not zero. The latter is not important for my question. Under certain assumption(s) on $a$ and $b$ it is not that difficult to find an interval around $\mu$ such that the RHS is indeed positive. However, it would be more suitable if I have conditions on $a$ and $b$ only (thus independent of $\mu$) such that the positiveness is guaranteed. I'm wondering if this is possible ...

In my opinion the big issue is the $-\mu^2$ in the numerator since this implies that I have to check:
$$\frac{5a\mu-4\mu^2-b}{15a\mu-20\mu^2-3b}<0$$
The expression is negative if and only if the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative (the other case is not possible here). Both numerator and denominator represent upside down parabola. If I write the denominator in vertex form then I guess I could force conditions on $a$ and $b$ such that it has a negative vertex and a negative discriminant and thus always negative values. However since the numerator is also an upside down parabola it is impossible to guarantee that it is always positive.

Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Siron said:
Hello!

I have the following expression:
$$\delta^2 = \frac{-\mu^2(5a\mu-4\mu^2-b)}{15a\mu-20\mu^2-3b}.$$
where $\mu \in \mathbb{R}$. Since $\delta^2$ is real (in the subject I'm working on) I need to check under which condition(s) the expression is well defined, that is, the RHS is positive and the denominator is not zero. The latter is not important for my question. Under certain assumption(s) on $a$ and $b$ it is not that difficult to find an interval around $\mu$ such that the RHS is indeed positive. However, it would be more suitable if I have conditions on $a$ and $b$ only (thus independent of $\mu$) such that the positiveness is guaranteed. I'm wondering if this is possible ...

In my opinion the big issue is the $-\mu^2$ in the numerator since this implies that I have to check:
$$\frac{5a\mu-4\mu^2-b}{15a\mu-20\mu^2-3b}<0$$
The expression is negative if and only if the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative (the other case is not possible here). Both numerator and denominator represent upside down parabola. If I write the denominator in vertex form then I guess I could force conditions on $a$ and $b$ such that it has a negative vertex and a negative discriminant and thus always negative values. However since the numerator is also an upside down parabola it is impossible to guarantee that it is always positive.

Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!

I think your plan in the last paragraph is the best you can do. As you say, you simply can't make the numerator of your fraction positive everywhere. However, I do see a problem even with the plan in your last paragraph: if you clamp down what $a$ and $b$ are by forcing the discriminant of the denominator to be negative, as well as the denominator having a negative vertex, that may not give you much flexibility in controlling how the numerator behaves, since the same $a$ and $b$ show up there. Theoretically, without considering the denominator for a second, you can control the shifting of the parabola in the numerator: $a$ controls the horizontal, and $b$ the vertical. Therefore, for any contiguous $\mu$ interval you desire, you can make the numerator positive on that interval. Which brings up the important point: can you restrict your attention to $\mu$ only in one interval? Suppose you have an interval $(x,y)$ to which you can restrict your $\mu$. You might possibly be able to find a non-empty intersection of the two sets:
$$\{(a,b):[(225a^2-4(20)(3b)<0] \, \land \, [(3b/20-9a^2/64)>0]\}$$
and
$$\{(a,b):-4\mu^2+5a\mu-b>0 \; \forall \, \mu\in(x,y)\}.$$
 
Ackbach said:
I think your plan in the last paragraph is the best you can do. As you say, you simply can't make the numerator of your fraction positive everywhere. However, I do see a problem even with the plan in your last paragraph: if you clamp down what $a$ and $b$ are by forcing the discriminant of the denominator to be negative, as well as the denominator having a negative vertex, that may not give you much flexibility in controlling how the numerator behaves, since the same $a$ and $b$ show up there. Theoretically, without considering the denominator for a second, you can control the shifting of the parabola in the numerator: $a$ controls the horizontal, and $b$ the vertical. Therefore, for any contiguous $\mu$ interval you desire, you can make the numerator positive on that interval. Which brings up the important point: can you restrict your attention to $\mu$ only in one interval? Suppose you have an interval $(x,y)$ to which you can restrict your $\mu$. You might possibly be able to find a non-empty intersection of the two sets:
$$\{(a,b):[(225a^2-4(20)(3b)<0] \, \land \, [(3b/20-9a^2/64)>0]\}$$
and
$$\{(a,b):-4\mu^2+5a\mu-b>0 \; \forall \, \mu\in(x,y)\}.$$

Thank you for your help Ackbach, I really appreciate it.

The two conditions of the first set are equivalent with $a^2 < \displaystyle \frac{16}{15}b$, which excludes $b<0$. Solving the inequality in the second set yields the following solution:
$$\mu \in \left]\frac{1}{8}\left(5a-\sqrt{25a^2-16b}\right), \frac{1}{8}\left(5a+\sqrt{25a^2-16b}\right)\right[$$
where $a \in \mathbb{R}$ and $b<\displaystyle \frac{25a^2}{16}$. The intersection of both sets is then given by:
$$\left \{a \in \mathbb{R}, b \in \left ] \frac{15}{16}a^2, \frac{25}{16}a^2\right[ \right \}$$
under the assumption that $\mu \in ]x,y[$ where $x$ and $y$ are given as above.
 
Siron said:
Thank you for your help Ackbach, I really appreciate it.

The two conditions of the first set are equivalent with $a^2 < \displaystyle \frac{16}{15}b$, which excludes $b<0$. Solving the inequality in the second set yields the following solution:
$$\mu \in \left]\frac{1}{8}\left(5a-\sqrt{25a^2-16b}\right), \frac{1}{8}\left(5a+\sqrt{25a^2-16b}\right)\right[$$
where $a \in \mathbb{R}$ and $b<\displaystyle \frac{25a^2}{16}$. The intersection of both sets is then given by:
$$\left \{a \in \mathbb{R}, b \in \left ] \frac{15}{16}a^2, \frac{25}{16}a^2\right[ \right \}$$
under the assumption that $\mu \in ]x,y[$ where $x$ and $y$ are given as above.

Yeah, I was just about to write that the two conditions in the first set are equivalent.

Your working looks correct to me! I think that's the best you can do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K