Guessing a coin toss correctly

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability of correctly guessing the outcomes of a series of coin tosses involving a biased coin. Participants explore various aspects of this problem, including the expected number of correct guesses, the implications of knowing the bias of the coin, and the arrangement of heads and tails in the tosses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the probability of guessing correctly at least ##k## times in ##n## tosses can be expressed as ##\sum_{i=k}^{n}C^n_{n-i}p^i(1-p)^{n-i}##, but express uncertainty about its symmetry for ##p## versus ##1-p##.
  • There is a suggestion that if the guesser knows the number of heads, the odds of a correct guess depend on the arrangement of heads and tails, with ##C^n_k## representing the different arrangements.
  • One participant assumes that if ##p > 0.5##, the guesser would maximize their score by guessing heads every time, leading to an average of ##np## correct guesses.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that if the guesser assumes equal likelihood of guessing heads or tails, the probability of guessing correctly is ##\frac{1}{2}##, regardless of the bias.
  • There is a challenge to the clarity of the original question, questioning whether it refers to guessing at least ##k## heads or predicting the number of heads in ##n## tosses, and whether the guesser knows the bias.
  • One participant notes that the odds of a correct guess cannot be singular, as the guesser can always guess the last toss with certainty if the previous outcomes are known.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the formulation of the probability and the implications of knowing the bias of the coin. There is no consensus on the correct approach or interpretation of the problem, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the guesser's strategy and knowledge of the coin's bias are not fully articulated, leading to potential ambiguity in the discussion. The mathematical expressions and reasoning presented are not universally accepted as correct.

member 428835
Given ##n## coin tosses of a biased coin with heads probability ##p##, what is the probability of guessing correctly ##k\leq n## or more? I think this is ##\sum_{i=k}^{n}C^n_{n-i}p^i(1-p)^{n-i}## but this can't be correct since it is not symmetric for ##p## vs ##1-p##. Also, what's the expected number of correct guesses we would predict the guesser to guess correctly? Sure feels something like ##np(1-p)##, but I dunno.

But now let's suppose the guesser knows there will be exactly ##k## heads tossed (##n-k## tails). In this case what would the odds of a correct guess be? We know there are ##C^n_k## different ways to arrange the heads/tails.

Thanks for any insight!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
joshmccraney said:
Given ##n## coin tosses of a biased coin with heads probability ##p##, what is the probability of guessing correctly ##k\leq n## or more? I think this is ##\sum_{i=k}^{n}nC{n-i}p^i(1-p)^{n-i}## but this can't be correct since it is not symmetric for ##p## vs ##. Also, what's the expected number of correct guesses we would predict the guesser to guess correctly? Sure feels something like ##np(1-p)##, but I dunno.

But now let's suppose the guesser knows there will be exactly ##k## heads tossed (##n-k## tails). In this case what would the odds of a correct guess be? We know there are ##nCk## different ways to arrange the heads/tails.

Thanks for any insight!
It depends on what the guesser does. To make progress I'll assume that if p > 0.5 then to maximize the score the guesser guesses heads every time. The average correct guesses will then be np.

You seem to assume that the guesser must guess heads exactly half the time. Then the average is np/2 + n(1-p)/2 = (np+n-np)/2 = n/2. Kind of surprising.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and member 428835
joshmccraney said:
But now let's suppose the guesser knows there will be exactly ##k## heads tossed (##n-k## tails). In this case what would the odds of a correct guess be? We know there are ##C^n_k## different ways to arrange the heads/tails.
You have an unknown arrangement of ##k## heads and ##n-k## tails. Assuming all such arrangements are equally likely (e.g. if you toss a fair or biased coin ##n## times and happen to get ##k## heads), then the best you can do is guess one of these possible arrangements.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein
joshmccraney said:
Given ##n## coin tosses of a biased coin with heads probability ##p##, what is the probability of guessing correctly ##k\leq n## or more? I think this is ##\sum_{i=k}^{n}C^n_{n-i}p^i(1-p)^{n-i}## but this can't be correct since it is not symmetric for ##p## vs ##1-p##.
Take one biased coin toss, where the guesser does not know it's biased and is equally likely to guess heads or tails. The probability of guessing correctly is ##\frac 1 2 p + \frac 1 2 (1-p) = \frac 1 2##. Kind of amusing!
 
joshmccraney said:
Given ##n## coin tosses of a biased coin with heads probability ##p##, what is the probability of guessing correctly ##k\leq n## or more?
  • What does this mean:
    • Tossing a biased coin ## n ## times and guessing heads or tails correctly at least ## k ## times?
    • Predicting correctly that there are at least ## k ## heads in ## n ## tosses?
    • Something else?
  • Does the guesser know the bias?
  • Why do you think any answer would be interesting?
joshmccraney said:
But now let's suppose the guesser knows there will be exactly ##k## heads tossed (##n-k## tails). In this case what would the odds of a correct guess be?
This is not very well thought through: there is no single "odds of a correct guess", for instance the guesser can always "guess" the ## n ##th toss with 100% certainty (if there have already been ## k ## heads it must be tails).
 
PeroK said:
Take one biased coin toss, where the guesser does not know it's biased and is equally likely to guess heads or tails. The probability of guessing correctly is ##\frac 1 2 p + \frac 1 2 (1-p) = \frac 1 2##. Kind of amusing!
It's not so surprising, for this reason:
Suppose you have already tossed a coin (fair or not) and got a head. At that point P(head)=1 and P(tail)=0, so it is about as unfair as it can be. Yet the probability of guessing correctly (head) is 1/2, simply because that is assumed to be how the guessing is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Standard odds a:b definition is related to probabability by $$ a:b \rightarrow \frac{a}{a+b} $$, so that,
e.g., 1:1 odds correspond to a probability of 1/2; odds of 2:1 correspond to 1/(1+2)=1/3, etc.

In your case, the probability is the sum of the probabilities of all such events.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K