Guessing cards: is 3 for 3 more improbable than 3 for 4?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bahamagreen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the probabilities of guessing cards correctly from a standard deck. The probability of guessing 3 out of 3 cards correctly is calculated as 7.5 × 10-6, while the probability of guessing 3 out of 4 cards correctly (with the fourth guess being incorrect) is 7.4 × 10-6. This indicates that guessing 3 out of 3 is slightly more improbable than guessing 3 out of 4. The calculations utilize the formula for conditional probability without replacement, specifically p(a and b and c) = p(a) x p(b|a) x p(c|b|a).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with conditional probability
  • Knowledge of combinatorial calculations
  • Ability to interpret probability notation, including the "|" symbol
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of conditional probability in depth
  • Learn about combinatorial probability and its applications
  • Explore the implications of drawing without replacement in probability
  • Investigate advanced probability topics, such as Bayesian inference
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, educators, and anyone interested in probability theory and card games.

bahamagreen
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
52
3 for 3 means guessing the first, second, and third cards of a pack without trying a fourth time... and 3 for 4 means guessing the first, second, and third correctly, but trying and missing the fourth. I think both are conditional (dependent) without replacement.

I see a form for 2 guesses that reads p(a and b) = p(a) x p(b|a) where the "and" means "and then",

I suppose for 3 guess it would be:

p(a and b and c) = p(a) x p(b|a) x p(c|b|a)

I'm not sure how to interpret the "|" symbol arithmetically... is it just a reminder that the actual calculation must be without replacement?

The story... A long time ago someone grabbed a deck of cards and asked me to guess the first one. Amazingly I guessed right, and then guessed correctly the second and the third. She wanted to pull a fourth card, but intuitively I felt that guessing three out of three was more improbable than guessing three out of four if I missed the last one, so I declined and said let's stay with the improbability of just three tries...

Recalling this event, I decided to check if my intuition was right, but am a bit confused on the calculation... and it may be that the calculation is additionally complicated by the guesser being allowed to halt the series of card guesses whenever he wants - another aspect of conditional dependent?

Any help on untangling the process to get a calculation is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume guesses are completely uninformed, with no hints or indicators available.

The probability of guessing 3 out of 3 is ##\frac{1}{52}\cdot\frac{1}{51}\cdot\frac{1}{50}=7.5\times 10^{-6}##

The probability of guessing 4 out of 4 is ##\frac{1}{52}\cdot\frac{1}{51}\cdot\frac{1}{50}\cdot\frac{1}{49}=1.5\times 10^{-7}##

The probability of guessing 3 out of 4, with the fourth guess being wrong, is ##\frac{1}{52}\cdot\frac{1}{51}\cdot\frac{1}{50}\cdot\frac{48}{49}=7.4\times 10^{-6}##, which is slightly less than the probability of 3 out of 3. Naturally, the first probability is equal to the sum of the next two.

bahamagreen said:
I'm not sure how to interpret the "|" symbol arithmetically... is it just a reminder that the actual calculation must be without replacement?
It means more than that in general. But in this case, where the only dependence between successive guesses is the absence of previously drawn cards, your interpretation works fine.
 
Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K