Guitar fret decreasing down a guitar

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ramly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing Guitar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the physics behind the decreasing spacing of frets on a guitar neck. Participants explore the relationship between string length, frequency, and the geometric progression of musical notes, as well as practical considerations in fret placement.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that to double the frequency of a note, the string length must halve, suggesting that this relationship explains why frets get closer together.
  • Another participant discusses the geometric progression of the Western musical scale, indicating that the string lengths decrease in the same ratio as the frequencies, specifically mentioning the factor of ##2^{1/12}##.
  • There is a mention of traditional guitar makers using a ratio of 18/17 for fret placement, which is close to the mathematical ratio of ##2^{1/12}##, though some participants question the accuracy of this method in achieving precise intervals.
  • Concerns are raised about practical factors affecting fret positions, such as the height of the action and the inharmonicity of the string, which can alter the frequency of fretted notes compared to theoretical positions.
  • One participant points out that special rulers with premarked fret positions are commonly used, as calculating intervals fret-to-fret can lead to cumulative errors.
  • A participant expresses a personal opinion about the rarity of fretless guitars in Western music, attributing this to their decreased acoustic volume and sustain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views regarding the methods and ratios used in fret placement, as well as the implications of practical factors on string frequency. The discussion remains unresolved on the effectiveness of traditional methods versus theoretical calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their discussions, such as the dependence on specific definitions and the unresolved nature of cumulative errors in fret calculations.

ramly
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
why does the spacing decrease going down the neck of a guitar?

using physics concepts how would this be explained? (equations and concepts)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To double the frequency of a note the string length must halve (assuming tension is constant) To produce any fractional change in frequency the length must change by the same fraction (or1/fraction)
Every halving of the length results in a doubling of the frequency, the frets get closer.
 
The frequencies of the Western musical scale of 12 semitones in a octave are a geometric progression, with a factor of ##2^{1/12}## between each frequency. The string lengths decrease in the same ratio.

Incidentally, the value of ##2^{1/12}## is very close to 18/17, which was (and probably still us) the ratio used by traditional guitar makers, who positioned the frets by making a drawing with a straight-edge and compasses, not by calculating and measuring.
 
AlephZero said:
.

Incidentally, the value of ##2^{1/12}## is very close to 18/17, which was (and probably still us) the ratio used by traditional guitar makers, who positioned the frets by making a drawing with a straight-edge and compasses, not by calculating and measuring.

You might not be able to hear the difference betweeb 18/17 = 1.0588 and 2^(1/12) = 1.0594, but you'll definitely be able to hear the difference between (18/17)^12 = 1.9856 and 2, so the traditinal guitar makers can't have made all their intervals 18/17.
 
willem2 said:
You might not be able to hear the difference betweeb 18/17 = 1.0588 and 2^(1/12) = 1.0594, but you'll definitely be able to hear the difference between (18/17)^12 = 1.9856 and 2, so the traditinal guitar makers can't have made all their intervals 18/17.

On a real guitar the fret positions are affected by the height of the action (the string tension changes as you press it down onto the fingerboard) and the inharmonicity of the string (it has its own instrinsic stiffness as well as the stiffeness generated by the tension). Both these increase the frequency of fretted notes relative to the theoretical fret positions.

The early guitar makers didn't know about partial differential equations, but they knew what worked in practice!
 
They used (and still do use) special rulers wih the fret positions premarked. This works because scale lengths are fairly standard.

Nobody computes intervals fret-to-fret because of the inability to control cumulative error.
 
I agree your advice AlephZero. But my opinion Fret less guitars are fairly uncommon in most forms of western music and generally limited to the electrified instruments due to decreased acoustic volume and sustain in fret less instruments. Thanks!

www.starlandguitar.com/brown-eyed-girl/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 165 ·
6
Replies
165
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K