Proton Soup
- 223
- 1
mheslep said:This thread would not meet the standards of a You Tube comments page. Please close.
it is little more than gossip. is Chirac still on trial for embezzlement?
mheslep said:This thread would not meet the standards of a You Tube comments page. Please close.
zomgwtf said:I'm pretty sure most people have admitted that they are only giving the story truth value as far as this discussion is concerned. They accept that it is not determined but the thread is ABOUT GW Bush being borderline insane?... that means the topic is: Given this article, and accepting it as true, would you consider GW to be borderline insane? It's not really a discussion about the validity of said argument. It's all hypothetical, and we accept that. If you can't then don't par-take in discussion?
I agree with most of this. Given the seemingly bizarre nature of the claim, there is relatively little to support it, and that most definitely warrants a healthy serving of skepticism.Pattonias said:It just doesn't seem to me that there is a discussion about the validity of the paper. It seems more like everyone is leaning back going "Oh, that explains it. He was just a religious wacko."
I would def. find this article of grave importance, but all evidence points to it being false. Mainstream media wasn't exactly friendly toward the guy so if they could have verified the facts it would have created a massive scandal. The "reliable" source we have is the former French President and nothing else.
I just feel like we are buying giving credence to the paper out of bias against the former President instead of looking to see if the paper itself is anything more than someone trying to sell their book by taking another stab an a popular target. It seems that so far this is a very un-PF discussion.
drankin said:Why would an evangelical want to stop a biblical prophecy? Doesn't make any sense. Most that I know can't wait till everything prophecied happens.
Gokul43201 said:2. More likely, there was a conversation involving some mention of Gog & Magog, and Chirac may be embellishing it for effect. This requires no conspiracy, as he may have still wanted to find out more about the 'ogs and the other players in the incident will confirm that they were queried about said 'ogs, but can profess no direct knowledge of the contents of the alleged conversation.
Geigerclick said:What is interesting, is that if this were confirmed, how many people would be shocked? Certainly it would be unusual, but not out of character, and that alone says a great deal about the man, and how he presented himself and ideas.