Half Life - Calculate Fraction Remaining

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 11K views
jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Carbon 14 has a half-life of 5730 years, what fraction will have decayed in 2300 years?

Homework Equations




Nf/No =e^-kt

The Attempt at a Solution



Nf/No =e^-1.21 x 10^-4 x 2300

=0.068585374

However if I use Nf =No(1/2)^2300/5730

I get 0.757125224

I appreciate that I'm looking for the fraction that has decayed but I'm unsure as to why this has produced 2 different answers, I thought either could be used for this problem.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recheck your math for the first formula.

EDIT: Doc Al beat me to it again.
 
I agree with them guys. You got it right using the second method jendrix. But maybe just a mistake while calculating using the first method.
 
Hi, I think I was using a wrong value for the decay constant but somehow wrote it down correct here.

My new answer is 0.77130147

I was wondering why there is a discrepancy albeit a small one depending on which formula I use, is it to do with the rounding of the constant?
 
jendrix said:
Hi, I think I was using a wrong value for the decay constant but somehow wrote it down correct here.

My new answer is 0.77130147

I was wondering why there is a discrepancy albeit a small one depending on which formula I use, is it to do with the rounding of the constant?
You're still making an error somewhere. Just evaluate the formula you gave in your first post:
jendrix said:
Nf/No =e^-1.21 x 10^-4 x 2300
That should give you the right answer.
 
Thanks Doc Al, I now get 0.757069666 as opposed to 0.757125224 from the other formula.
Is this where rounding the constant has had an effect?

Now I have to find the fraction that was lost to decay, if i do 1 - 0.757069666 to give 0.242930334 would you consider this sufficient or should I call it 6/25?
 
jendrix said:
Thanks Doc Al, I now get 0.757069666 as opposed to 0.757125224 from the other formula.
Is this where rounding the constant has had an effect?
Yes. (But round off your answers to a reasonable number of significant figures.)
Now I have to find the fraction that was lost to decay, if i do 1 - 0.757069666 to give 0.242930334 would you consider this sufficient or should I call it 6/25?
That decimal should be fine (rounded off, of course). (When they say 'fraction' they probably don't literally mean fraction, as in numerator/denominator.)
 
Excellent, thanks for all your help guys :smile: