Half Life - Calculate Fraction Remaining

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the fraction of Carbon-14 that has decayed over a period of 2300 years, given its half-life of 5730 years. The original poster attempts to use two different formulas to arrive at the fraction remaining, leading to different results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of two formulas for calculating the fraction remaining, questioning the discrepancies in results. There are attempts to verify calculations and clarify the impact of rounding on the decay constant.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in verifying calculations and discussing the implications of rounding on their results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the accuracy of the methods used, but no consensus has been reached on the final fraction lost to decay.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential errors in the decay constant value and the significance of rounding in calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the sufficiency of their final answer.

jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Carbon 14 has a half-life of 5730 years, what fraction will have decayed in 2300 years?

Homework Equations




Nf/No =e^-kt

The Attempt at a Solution



Nf/No =e^-1.21 x 10^-4 x 2300

=0.068585374

However if I use Nf =No(1/2)^2300/5730

I get 0.757125224

I appreciate that I'm looking for the fraction that has decayed but I'm unsure as to why this has produced 2 different answers, I thought either could be used for this problem.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jendrix said:
Nf/No =e^-1.21 x 10^-4 x 2300

=0.068585374
Redo this.
 
Recheck your math for the first formula.

EDIT: Doc Al beat me to it again.
 
I agree with them guys. You got it right using the second method jendrix. But maybe just a mistake while calculating using the first method.
 
Hi, I think I was using a wrong value for the decay constant but somehow wrote it down correct here.

My new answer is 0.77130147

I was wondering why there is a discrepancy albeit a small one depending on which formula I use, is it to do with the rounding of the constant?
 
jendrix said:
Hi, I think I was using a wrong value for the decay constant but somehow wrote it down correct here.

My new answer is 0.77130147

I was wondering why there is a discrepancy albeit a small one depending on which formula I use, is it to do with the rounding of the constant?
You're still making an error somewhere. Just evaluate the formula you gave in your first post:
jendrix said:
Nf/No =e^-1.21 x 10^-4 x 2300
That should give you the right answer.
 
Thanks Doc Al, I now get 0.757069666 as opposed to 0.757125224 from the other formula.
Is this where rounding the constant has had an effect?

Now I have to find the fraction that was lost to decay, if i do 1 - 0.757069666 to give 0.242930334 would you consider this sufficient or should I call it 6/25?
 
jendrix said:
Thanks Doc Al, I now get 0.757069666 as opposed to 0.757125224 from the other formula.
Is this where rounding the constant has had an effect?
Yes. (But round off your answers to a reasonable number of significant figures.)
Now I have to find the fraction that was lost to decay, if i do 1 - 0.757069666 to give 0.242930334 would you consider this sufficient or should I call it 6/25?
That decimal should be fine (rounded off, of course). (When they say 'fraction' they probably don't literally mean fraction, as in numerator/denominator.)
 
Excellent, thanks for all your help guys :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K