Half life of multi chain decays

  • Thread starter Thread starter heroslayer99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Half life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the half-life of multi-chain decays, particularly how it relates to the decay rates of intermediate steps. It suggests that if the decay rate of Y is significantly higher than that of X, the decay events occur closely together, leading to a total decay rate that approximates twice that of X. A differential equation can be established to analyze this relationship further. The conversation also raises questions about the measurement of activities and whether they are distinguishable. Overall, the relationship between half-lives in multi-chain decays is complex and requires careful mathematical modeling.
heroslayer99
Messages
33
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
If we had a multi decay mechanism where say, X decayed into Y then Y decayed into Z, and we plotted activity against time of a sample of X, what would the half life of the graph represent? (Assume the half life of X to Y step is much greater than the Y to Z half life)
Relevant Equations
x
I am not really too sure where to start with this one, I would guess that the half life of the graph is very similar to the half life of the X to Y step, but at the same time I am unsure of how I would prove it. Any tips or reading material? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you could set up a differential equation and solve it.

A more qualitative approach would be to say: if the decay rate constant (inversely proportional to half life) of Y is much greater than that of X, then effectively X decays relatively slowly, and (almost) every time an X decays to a Y, that Y (almost) immediately decays to a Z. In other words, every time an X decays there are two decay events within a very short time of each other. So the total decay rate is (to a good approximation) twice the decay rate of X; the two graphs are the same except that one has the y coordinate multiplied by 2, and the half lives are the same.

Now do the differential equation.
 
It depends what activity is measured. Are the two activities indistinguishable?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top