How Are Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Related in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TimeRip496
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Lagrangian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian are fundamentally related through the Legendre Transformation, which is crucial in transitioning from Lagrangian mechanics to Hamiltonian mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian acts as an operator representing the total energy of the system, while the Lagrangian is utilized primarily in particle mechanics. The Lagrangian density, distinct from the Lagrangian, is employed in field theory and is defined as a function of field values and their derivatives, representing the Lagrangian per unit volume. This relationship is essential for understanding dynamics in both classical and quantum frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of Legendre Transformation
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Legendre Transformation in detail
  • Explore the role of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about Lagrangian density in the context of field theory
  • Investigate the relationship between classical and quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of classical and quantum field theories will benefit from this discussion.

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
"The hamiltonian runs over the time axis while the lagrangian runs over the trajectory of the moving particle, the t'-axis."
What does the above statement means? Isnt hamiltonian just an operator that corresponds to total energy of a system? How is hamiltonian related to lagrangian intuitively?

Besides what is lagrangian density intuitively and mathematically? Is it equal to lagrangian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the future, it's best to provide a reference to a quote so that folks can easily look at the source and context of the quote.
I had to do a Google search and guessed this was the source.

Concerning the statement of the quote...
The interpretation doesn't seem to be a standard interpretation... but it seems interesting and might be worthy of further study.
I can't say I understand enough of that interpretation to give a summary of the idea. (Do a search for ... hans de vries largrangian ).

Since you refer to the Hamiltonian as an operator, your context seems to be quantum mechanics or quantum field theory, which appears to be the context of the quote. (See Ch 22 of the document that comes up in the Google search.)

In classical mechanics, the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian are related by a Legendre Transformation.
I don't have yet an "intuitive" explanation of that relationship... beyond saying it's an important transformation of variables. (part of a backburner project)

While the largrangian is used in particle mechanics (with few degrees of freedom),
the Lagrangian density is used in field theory (with many more degrees of freedom).
Rather than being a function of configurations and velocities,
it is a function of the field values and their derivatives in some region of space.
Crudely speaking, the Lagrangian density is in some sense the Lagrangian-per-unit-volume.

Possibly useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K