Hamiltonian function vs. operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Hamiltonian function in classical mechanics and the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics. The Hamiltonian function, expressed as H(r,p) = p²/2m + 1/2 kr², describes the total energy of a system, while the Hamiltonian operator, represented as &hat;H = &hat;p²/2m + 1/2 kr², operates on wave functions in quantum mechanics. Both share a similar formal expression but serve different purposes in their respective theories. The transition from the Hamiltonian function to the Hamiltonian operator involves substituting momentum variables with gradient operators, leading to significant insights in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of wave functions and operators
  • Basic mathematical skills in calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion from the Hamiltonian function
  • Explore the application of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics
  • Read E. Schroedinger's "Collected papers on wave mechanics" for foundational insights
  • Investigate David B. Cook's "Probability and Schroedinger's mechanics" for advanced connections
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in theoretical mechanics and quantum mechanics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between classical and quantum theories.

Habeebe
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I've dealt with both the Hamiltonian function for Hamiltonian mechanics, and the Hamiltonian operator for quantum mechanics. I have a kind of qualitative understanding of how they're similar, especially when the Hamiltonian function is just the total energy of the system, but I was wondering if there was some kind of quantitative way that they are related to each other? In short, what's the connection between the Hamiltonian function and the Hamiltonian operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They have similar formal expression. For example, let us take harmonic oscillator to explain this.

In theoretical mechanics, the system is described by the Hamiltonian function of position and momentum

$$
H(r,p) = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}kr^2,
$$

and we can derive equations of motion for ##r##, ##p## from it.

While the Hamiltonian operator for the same kind of system in wave mechanics is the operator

$$
\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}kr^2,
$$
where ##\hat{p} = - i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial r }##, acting on complex functions of ##r##.

As you can see, the function ##H(r,p)## and the operator ##\hat{H}## look similar, but they are different concepts from different theories. In order to get some interesting results from them, they are used in calculations in a different way.

The form of the Hamiltonian operator is often similar or motivated by the form of some Hamilton function. One often fruitful procedure is that one takes some interesting function ##H(r,p)## (for non-interacting particles in a box, or particle in a central field), changes ##p_a##'s into gradient operators ##\hat{p}_a##'s and takes the resulting expression as operator acting on functions of ##r_a##.

If you are interested in the connections between the functions and the operators, I recommend original Schroedinger's papers in

E. Schroedinger, Collected papers on wave mechanics, Blackie and Son Limited, 1928

Also very interesting view on the connection between original Hamiltonian formalism and Schroedinger's equation can be found in more recent book by theoretical chemist David Cook:

David B. Cook, Probability and Schroedinger's mechanics, World Scientific 2002
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 156 ·
6
Replies
156
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K