Hamiltonian for an Optical Phase Shifter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Hamiltonian for an optical phase shifter as presented in "Efficient Linear Optics Quantum Computation" by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn. The expression for the Hamiltonian is given as ##\textbf{n}^{(\ell)} = \textbf{a}^{(\ell)\dagger} \textbf{a}^{(\ell)}##, where ##\ell## denotes the mode, and the authors operate under the spinless boson formalism. The user expresses confusion regarding the derivation of the phase shifter Hamiltonian, particularly when attempting to apply a similar approach used for the beam splitter Hamiltonian, resulting in a scalar Hamiltonian of ##e^{i\phi} - 1##. The user seeks clarification on their methodology in quantum optics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with optical phase shifters and their role in quantum optics
  • Knowledge of spinless bosons and their quantization
  • Basic grasp of coherent states in quantum optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the beam splitter Hamiltonian in detail
  • Explore the concept of optical phase space and its implications in quantum optics
  • Learn about the mathematical formalism of coherent states and their applications
  • Investigate the role of unitary operators in quantum mechanics and their relation to Hamiltonians
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and students of quantum optics seeking to deepen their understanding of Hamiltonians and phase shifters in optical systems.

Twigg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
893
Reaction score
483
Hey all,

I was reading Efficient Linear Optics Quantum Computation by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, when I came across their expression for the Hamiltonian for a phase shifter, given as ##\textbf{n}^{(\ell)} = \textbf{a}^{(\ell)\dagger} \textbf{a}^{(\ell)}##, where ##\ell## indicates the mode. (They ignore polarization and work in the formalism of spinless bosons.) How does one get this?
I was able to get the beam splitter Hamiltonian by looking at the evolution operator (the unitary operator that takes an input photon in the x direction and spits out a superpostion of x and y photons) and subtracting out identity. But this gives a scalar Hamiltonian of ##e^{i\phi} - 1## when I think about following the same procedure for the phase shifter. Am I looking at this the wrong way? I'm completely new to quantum optics. I'm familiar with the quantization of the EM field, but that's about it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K