Hey all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was reading Efficient Linear Optics Quantum Computation by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, when I came across their expression for the Hamiltonian for a phase shifter, given as ##\textbf{n}^{(\ell)} = \textbf{a}^{(\ell)\dagger} \textbf{a}^{(\ell)}##, where ##\ell## indicates the mode. (They ignore polarization and work in the formalism of spinless bosons.) How does one get this?

I was able to get the beam splitter Hamiltonian by looking at the evolution operator (the unitary operator that takes an input photon in the x direction and spits out a superpostion of x and y photons) and subtracting out identity. But this gives a scalar Hamiltonian of ##e^{i\phi} - 1## when I think about following the same procedure for the phase shifter. Am I looking at this the wrong way? I'm completely new to quantum optics. I'm familiar with the quantization of the EM field, but that's about it.

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Hamiltonian for an Optical Phase Shifter?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Hamiltonian Optical Phase | Date |
---|---|

I Two dimenstional Heisenberg Hamiltonian for spin 1/2 system | Tuesday at 2:16 PM |

I Hamiltonian in Schrödinger: necessarily total energy? | Feb 22, 2018 |

Perturbing Hamiltonian optical absorption in semiconductors | Jan 28, 2015 |

Quantum Hamiltonian Question | Sep 16, 2014 |

Construction of Hamiltonian for interacting optical fields | Jan 25, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**