Hand Pushes Block: Horizontal Forces Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter mujadeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block hand
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
mujadeo
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Not an actual HW problem, but related to a lot of probs I'm doing.
Lets say a hand pushes a block across a surface (with friction).
You take pic of 2 timepoints
1) when hand pushes block
2) After hand has let go and block is slowing due to friction

Now when I draw the FBD for situation #2, I am confused about the horizontal forces. (i know that vertical forces cancel)

I know that 1 vector (kinetic friction) will point opposite the motion.



Homework Equations


BUT: Is there a forces that goes in the direction of motion?
If there isn't, then how is the block moving??
If there is, then what force could that be, seeing as the hand is no longer in contact with the block??


Thanks in advance for any explanation!

The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
mujadeo said:

Homework Statement


Not an actual HW problem, but related to a lot of probs I'm doing.
Lets say a hand pushes a block across a surface (with friction).
You take pic of 2 timepoints
1) when hand pushes block
2) After hand has let go and block is slowing due to friction

Now when I draw the FBD for situation #2, I am confused about the horizontal forces. (i know that vertical forces cancel)

I know that 1 vector (kinetic friction) will point opposite the motion.
yes, correct.



Homework Equations


BUT: Is there a forces that goes in the direction of motion?
What does your FBD show you?
If there isn't, then how is the block moving??
The hand sure helped. What would happen to the object after the hand was released if there were no friction? Why?
If there is, then what force could that be, seeing as the hand is no longer in contact with the block??
Right, good point.
 
My problem is in drawing the correct FBD, so at moment I am not relying on FBD for info
But this is how i think it should look: (W and N are sposed to be equal lengths)

http://www.imagination3.com/LaunchP...l=mujadeo@yahoo.com&to_name=&_lscid=184982417

Yes I know hand got it moving, but if FBD is sposed to show forces on it, then there should be no force in pos x direction (right), because the hand is no longer in contact with block, right?
But if no force in in pos x, then according to diagram, Fnet is to the left, and object is moving to the left (according to the diagram)?

If there was no friction, then block would move at constant velocity in pos x direction. (and accel would be zero)

tanks for your help
 
Last edited:
mujadeo said:
My problem is in drawing the correct FBD, so at moment I am not relying on FBD for info
But this is how i think it should look: (W and N are sposed to be equal lengths)

http://www.imagination3.com/LaunchP...l=mujadeo@yahoo.com&to_name=&_lscid=184982417

Yes I know hand got it moving, but if FBD is sposed to show forces on it, then there should be no force in pos x direction (right), because the hand is no longer in contact with block, right?
But if no force in in pos x, then according to diagram, Fnet is to the left, and object is moving to the left (according to the diagram)?

If there was no friction, then block would move at constant velocity in pos x direction. (and accel would be zero)

tanks for your help
Yes, your FBD is OK. You have correctly noted that there is only one horizontal force acting, the friction force, which is the net force, acting left. But per Newton 2, if the net force is left, then the acceleration is left, not necessarily the motion, which in this case is still to the right until the block stops. As you also have correctly noted, you don't need forces to keep a body moving. Forces retard or accelerate the motion; they do not keep it in motion, as noted in Newton 1.
 
SO am i corerect in saying that A FBD tells us nothing about which direction an object is moving (the velocity vector) , only its direction (and mag) of acceleration.
If that's true then Fnet says nothing about velocity, and a system with Fnet=0 could be stationary or going any speed or direction? ( velocity is completely independent of Fnet at all right?)
 
mujadeo said:
SO am i corerect in saying that A FBD tells us nothing about which direction an object is moving (the velocity vector) , only its direction (and mag) of acceleration.
If that's true then Fnet says nothing about velocity, and a system with Fnet=0 could be stationary or going any speed or direction? ( velocity is completely independent of Fnet at all right?)
That is correct. You get velocity from the kinematics or energy equations, or given data, etc. A system with F_net = 0 is either at rest or moving at constant speed in a certain direction, and will remain at rest, or moving in a straight line at a constant speed in that direction, as the case may be, unless acted on by a net unbalanced force (Newton 1).