Harmonic function bounded below also bounded above

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of harmonic functions, specifically whether a nonnegative harmonic function that is bounded below is also bounded above, leading to the conclusion that it must be constant. The scope includes theoretical aspects of harmonic functions, complex analysis, and applications of Liouville's Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that proving a nonnegative harmonic function is constant requires showing it is also bounded above, referencing Liouville's Theorem.
  • Another participant suggests considering the harmonic conjugate of the function and applying complex analytic methods, hinting at a deeper connection to Liouville's Theorem.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the application of Liouville's Theorem, noting that the real part of the analytic function is only bounded below.
  • One participant discusses the composition of entire functions and suggests that if a certain composition is bounded, it could imply that the original function is constant, while identifying the need for a specific entire function.
  • A participant presents a potential solution involving a specific function but questions the validity of their approach due to concerns about the analyticity of the function used.
  • Another participant confirms that the proposed function is not entire due to a singularity, emphasizing the necessity of using entire functions for Liouville's Theorem to apply correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of Liouville's Theorem and the conditions under which it can be applied. There is no consensus on whether the proposed solution is valid, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to proving the initial claim.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the analyticity of certain functions and the implications of singularities on the application of Liouville's Theorem. The discussion reflects a reliance on complex analysis principles and the need for careful consideration of function properties.

Grothard
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am trying to prove that a nonnegative (so bounded below) harmonic function is constant. I know that Liouville's Theorem states that if a function is bounded both above and below then it is constant.
This means it would be sufficient to prove that a harmonic function bounded below is always bounded above. How can one show that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the harmonic conjugate of your harmonic function u, which exists assuming u is harmonic on R^2. Then you have an analytic function and it boils down to complex analytic methods. Giving away this next part is giving away the entire problem, but if you've seen enough applications of Liouville you'll know what to do next.
 
Last edited:
I'm still a bit confused. I now have an analytic function whose real part is bounded below, but Liouville requires it to be bounded from both sides. I tried playing around with Cauchy-Riemann, but didn't get anywhere. Could I get some more help?
 
The idea is that if you have two entire functions g and f, then we can try to apply Liouville to [itex]g \circ f[/itex], which is also entire. If this last function is bounded, hence constant, we try to deduce that f is constant. Here we take f to be the analytic function whose real part is bounded below. We need to find the g just described. There is a well known function g with the property that |g(z)| is simply g(Re(z)).
 
Here is the solution I came up with. I'm not quite sure if it's valid, though.

Let x(z) >= 0 be the given harmonic function and let y(z) be its harmonic conjugate. Then f(z) = x(z) + iy(z) is analytic and entire.
Let g(z) = 2/(z + conjugate(z) + 2). Then g(f(z)) = 1/(x(z) + 1). Since x(z) >= 0, |g(f(z))| <= 1, so g(f(z)) = k.
This means 1/(x(z) + 1) = k, so x(z) = (1 - k)/k.
This proves that x(z) is a constant and we are done.

The problem I have here is that I don't think g(z) is entire or analytic, so Liouville doesn't necessarily hold... or does it? How could I fix it?
 
Right, g is not entire since it has a singularity at z = -1. You need your functions to be entire to apply Liouville. When you think of a specific example of an entire function, the exponential function should come to mind. Furthermore, the modulus of the exponential is the exponential of the real part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K