Harmonic Oscillator Analytical Mechanics: Creation/Annihilation Ops

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
Loxias
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Hamiltonian for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator is given by:
[tex]H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+ \frac{mw^2q^2}{2}[/tex]

Homework Equations



(a) Express H in terms of the following coordinates:

[tex]a = \sqrt{\frac{mw}{2}} (q+i\frac{p}{mw})[/tex]
[tex]a^* = \sqrt{\frac{mw}{2}} (q-i\frac{p}{mw})[/tex]

(b) Calculate the following Poisson Brackets: {a*,H} {a,H}, {a, a*}
(c) Write and solve the equations of motion for a and a.

The Attempt at a Solution



a. simple algebra :
[tex]H = waa^*[/tex]

b. again, algebra :
[tex]\{a^*,H\} = iwa^*, \{a,H\} = -iwa, \{a,a^*\} = -i[/tex]

c.

this is where I'm having trouble. I don't really get the question.. what's the conjugate momentum? what's the coordinates? where do I start from? :)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Loxias said:
(c) Write and solve the equations of motion for a and a. [my edit--I assume you mean a and a*?]

...
c.

this is where I'm having trouble. I don't really get the question.. what's the conjugate momentum? what's the coordinates? where do I start from? :)

Thanks

Perhaps you should start with, 'what does it mean "equations of motion"?' This means, in Hamiltonian dynamics, that you need to find the time-derivative of a and a-star.
 


Also, I think part a is wrong. You may want to double check your algebra.
 


I rechecked part a again, and also solved it using another method, got the same answer. I also think It's right since it resembles the quantum hamiltonian, without [tex]\hbar[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex], which makes sense.

For the third part, I used [tex]\dot{a} = \{a,h\}[/tex] and solved it.
Before I did that simple thing, I expressed q and p using a, a*, wrote an expression for [tex]\dot{a}, \dot{a^*}[/tex] and then used the hamiltonian equations of motion to express [tex]\dot{p}, \dot{q}[/tex] using a, a*, and got the same result :)

Thanks for your help :smile:
 


Loxias said:
I rechecked part a again, and also solved it using another method, got the same answer. I also think It's right since it resembles the quantum hamiltonian, without [tex]\hbar[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex], which makes sense.

The way I see it, it pretty much is the quantum harmonic oscillator with [itex]\hbar=1[/itex] units:

[tex] q^2=\frac{1}{2m\omega}\left(a+a^*\right)^2[/tex]

[tex] p^2=-\frac{m\omega^2}{4}\left(a-a^*\right)^2[/tex]

so that

[tex] \begin{array}{ll}<br /> H&=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2q^2}{2} \\ <br /> &=-\frac{\omega}{4}\left(aa-aa^*-a^*a+a^a^*\right)+\frac{\omega}{4}\left(aa+aa^*+a^*a+a^*a^*\right) \\<br /> &=\frac{\omega}{4}\left(2aa^*+2a^*a\right) \\<br /> &=\omega\left(aa^*+\frac{1}{2}\right)<br /> \end{array}[/tex]

It looks, though, that the factor of [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] isn't necessary for parts (b) and (c), just part (a)--this is because you can solve the Poisson brackets in terms of [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex], in which case you can use the Hamiltonian you began with.
 
Last edited:


I think you are treating a, a* as operators (used commuting relation in the last part, if I'm not mistaken), while here they are simply coordinates, and aa* = a*a.
Please note that you expressed [tex]p^2, q^2[/tex] in a wrong way but then corrected it in H.

Also, my algebra is

[tex]waa^* = \frac{mw^2}{2} (q^2 + \frac{p^2}{(mw)^2}) = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{mw^2q^2}{2} = H[/tex]

I also did this by expressing q and p using a, a* and got the same result.
 


Loxias said:
I think you are treating a, a* as operators (used commuting relation in the last part, if I'm not mistaken),

Ha, that I am. I have been stuck on my QM for the last several days before my final on Wednesday--of course it doesn't help that your title says "creation/annihilation ops". Your answer is right then.
Loxias said:
Please note that you expressed [tex]p^2, q^2[/tex] in a wrong way but then corrected it in H.

Right, there should have been a squared term on the parenthesis--just fixed those too. Glad I could help!
 


If I remember correctly, the half in the quantum hamiltonian is the vacuum energy, and is a quantum effect, not classical. (This all may be wrong, don't take me up for it :) )
 


Good luck on your exam!
 


Loxias said:
Good luck on your exam!

Thanks!