Stargazing Has a Deep Field Picture of the Sky Been Captured with a Radio Telescope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zuz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture Sky
AI Thread Summary
Deep field images of the sky using radio telescopes have been explored, with early efforts from instruments like the Big Ear and Mills Cross. The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) excels in pulsar detection due to its larger aperture but is limited in deep sky imaging due to its single location and sensitivity issues. High-resolution deep sky observations require techniques like Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), which involves international collaboration and significant numerical processing. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is positioned to achieve much higher resolution for deep sky observations due to its distributed aperture and steerable elements. Overall, while progress has been made, challenges remain in capturing detailed deep field images with radio telescopes.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
Has anyone ever taken a "deep field" picture of the sky, like Hubble, but with a radio telescope?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Some of the early radio astronomical survey mapping was done by telescopes like "Big Ear" in the North, or by the Mills Cross in the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University_Radio_Observatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mills_Cross_Telescope

To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
 
Baluncore said:
To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope. I wonder whether this is for a reason or due to the relatively young age of FAST.
 
fresh_42 said:
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope.
Deep sky observations require high sensitivity and high resolution. Unfortunately, man-made interference, and nearby bright sources, raise the noise floor of the synthesised images.

The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), operating alone, is a single location observatory. Resolution is limited by the 500 metre diameter. FAST finds more pulsars because it has a larger aperture area, and therefore has higher sensitivity than earlier observatories. It can make point measurements, where the signal is the sum of all the beam energy. That is suited to strong signals, or pulsar observations, not deep sky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-hundred-meter_Aperture_Spherical_Telescope

The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) has a distributed aperture, so should have over 1000 times the resolution of FAR, since SKA is designed to operate as a long baseline interferometer. That would be more suited to deep sky observations, if you can find and fund the computer time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Kilometre_Array

FAST is located at about 26° North, and zenith limited, so is restricted to the northern sky. It is not as steerable as the elements of the SKA.
The SKA is based in Africa and Australia, with many more steerable elements. It is better positioned to observe the southern sky with the best view of the Milky Way.
 
Thank you. That is just what I was looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top