Has any experiment actually measured PI to many places?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the measurement of Pi (π) and whether it can be physically measured in a laboratory setting. Participants clarify that Pi is a mathematical constant defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, and it has been calculated to over 13 trillion decimal places using mathematical methods rather than physical measurements. The consensus is that any physical attempt to measure Pi would be limited by measurement accuracy and would not yield a value more precise than what has already been established mathematically. Furthermore, the conversation touches on the implications of curvature in spacetime on the value of Pi, emphasizing that deviations from Euclidean geometry would not alter its established value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical constants, specifically Pi (π)
  • Familiarity with Euclidean geometry and its principles
  • Basic knowledge of measurement accuracy and experimental methods
  • Awareness of computational methods for calculating Pi
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Pi using series, such as the Gregory-Leibniz series
  • Explore the implications of curvature in spacetime on geometric measurements
  • Investigate the historical methods used to calculate Pi and their accuracy
  • Learn about modern computational techniques for calculating Pi to high precision
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in the theoretical and practical aspects of mathematical constants and geometry.

squirrlmcduckles
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Ok,
This probably seems a silly question, but has there been any 'serious' attempt to measure Pi PHYSICALLY, like in a lab, using say a light fiber in a circle and one down the radius?
If so, where can I find the results/paper?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pi is a mathematical constant. It is determined through mathematical means, not through experimental means.
 
squirrlmcduckles said:
Ok,
This probably seems a silly question, but has there been any 'serious' attempt to measure Pi PHYSICALLY, like in a lab, using say a light fiber in a circle and one down the radius?
If so, where can I find the results/paper?
Thanks!
What would be the point? Any physical measurement would be limited to a handful of decimal places only, and π has been calculated to more than 13 trillion decimal places as of 2015.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
 
squirrlmcduckles: Maybe you are thinking along the following lines: π is defined as the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. In order to know what that value is, we need to draw a circle and measure the circumference and the diameter, i.e. a physical measurement. But π turns up in many mathematical expressions that can be calculated by computer to high degrees of precision. So we are not dependent on a physical measurement.
 
Well, the reason for the seemingly weird question is this.
Pi represents a measurement of 2d to 1d ratio, if we were in a curved spacetime, say on an apple surface, the value of Pi would be different.

So my real thought is, is Pi actually 3.0, and the .14159 just an effect of the expansion of the universe? i.e local/global spacetime curvature?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
squirrlmcduckles said:
Well, the reason for the seemingly weird question is this.
Pi represents a measurement of 2d to 1d ratio, if we were in a curved spacetime, say on an apple surface, the value of Pi would be different.

So my real thought is, is Pi actually 3.0, and the .14159 just an effect of the expansion of the universe? i.e local/global spacetime curvature?
This is nonsense.

The circumference of a circle is a length, a one-dimensional quantity. Pi is not a 2d to 1d ratio.
 
squirrlmcduckles said:
but has there been any 'serious' attempt to measure Pi PHYSICALLY



You shouldn't have put "serious" in scare quotes.
 
squirrlmcduckles said:
So my real thought is, is Pi actually 3.0, and the .14159 just an effect of the expansion of the universe? i.e local/global spacetime curvature?

No. Pi really is 3.14159...
You can mathematically construct a circle in a flat geometry and the ratio of the circumference of the circle to its diameter is exactly pi. Just about any graphing utility on the web will let you do this.
 
squirrlmcduckles said:
So my real thought is, is Pi actually 3.0, and the .14159 just an effect of the expansion of the universe? i.e local/global spacetime curvature?
A circumference to radius ratio of 3.0 would indicate positive curvature. A ratio of PI indicates zero curvature.
 
  • #10
Your thought is very interesting at least to me. However what is being said here by other members that you can calculate the value of pi much better using mathematical methods rather than physical ones, especially nowdays that computer hardware has evolved a lot.

For example it is

##\pi\approx 4 \sum\limits_{n=0}^{k} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)}##

the higher k you put the better approximation of pi you get.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
squirrlmcduckles said:
Ok,
This probably seems a silly question, but has there been any 'serious' attempt to measure Pi PHYSICALLY, like in a lab, using say a light fiber in a circle and one down the radius?
If so, where can I find the results/paper?
Thanks!

pi is a mathematical constant, not a physical constant. It is similar to e, the number 42, etc... You do not "verify" them via experiments. You verify/derive them via logical mathematical arguments.

Zz.
 
  • #12
Might be interesting to know how many drops N of Buffon's needle on average one has to make to achieve n correct decimals of π with say .95 certainty.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
squirrlmcduckles said:
Well, the reason for the seemingly weird question is this.
Pi represents a measurement of 2d to 1d ratio, if we were in a curved spacetime, say on an apple surface, the value of Pi would be different.

So my real thought is, is Pi actually 3.0, and the .14159 just an effect of the expansion of the universe? i.e local/global spacetime curvature?

Or wait, maybe pi is actually 100 and the -96.858 is just an effect of the expansion of the universe? Or maybe pi is 10,000 and etc... Let me guess, my suggestions for pi seem silly but 3 seems reasonable to you?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
squirrlmcduckles said:
Ok,
This probably seems a silly question, but has there been any 'serious' attempt to measure Pi PHYSICALLY, like in a lab, using say a light fiber in a circle and one down the radius?
If so, where can I find the results/paper?
Thanks!
Pi is by definition the ratio of the radius of a circle to its diameter in Euclidian space, and its value has been calculated to many decimal places (and can always be calculated to more). Thus, the measurement that you're describing is not a measurement of the value of pi - we already know that. It is a measurement of how accurately Euclidian geometry describes the universe we live in; any discrepancy between calculated value of pi and the measured ratio (that cannot be attributed to the inaccuracy of the measurement) indicates that we do not live in a perfectly Euclidian universe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137 and Delta2
  • #16
A.T. said:
A circumference to radius ratio of 3.0 would indicate positive curvature. A ratio of PI indicates zero curvature.
Note that such a ratio would not be a constant. It would depend on the radius of the circle. The smaller the circle, the smaller the effect of the region's curvature on the ratio of circumference to diameter. In the limit of increasingly small circles, the ratio is still pi, regardless of whether curvature is positive, negative or zero -- as long as it is not infinite.

Edit: Consider, for instance, circles scribed on the surface of the earth. The length of the equator (circumference) is twice the distance from equator to pole and back (diameter). But a crop circle will have a circumference to diameter ratio pretty close to pi.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
  • #17
Nugatory said:
... Thus, the measurement that you're describing is not a measurement of the value of pi - we already know that. It is a measurement of how accurately Euclidian geometry describes the universe we live in; any discrepancy between calculated value of pi and the measured ratio (that cannot be attributed to the inaccuracy of the measurement) indicates that we do not live in a perfectly Euclidian universe.

I think this was the OP's point?

Seems to me, the deviation from Euclidean in any small circle is so small that it would be lost in the measurement errors. So, you'd need to measure a really big circle. Unless you're caught in the grip of a black hole, isn't "our universe" pretty flat? Then a really big circle would be Euclidean so you wouldn't see any deviation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Undergrad A high school physics problem demonstrating relative motion
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
542
Graduate Photon Bouncing during APD Dead Time in Autocorrelation Measurement
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate How much funding/resources are spent in string theory research?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
High School Michelson Morley experiment and the Doppler effect
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Ruler measurements and knowing how many decimal places to include
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Undergrad Measure of existence? (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
High School How Do You Properly Calculate Uncertainty in Measurements?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Calc Excess Rad on Earth in Curved 3D Space | Feynman Lectures 6-2
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
High School The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
789
Graduate How do people explore new ideas in physics?
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K