Has anyone used Redox OS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Woolford180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox Rust
Click For Summary
Redox OS is a new Unix-based operating system utilizing a micro-kernel architecture and written in Rust. It is still in the alpha/beta stage, having started in 2015, and is not yet at a stable 1.0 release. While it has received positive reviews for performance, it is considered more suitable for experimentation rather than production use due to its current limitations. A significant concern is the lack of extensive support libraries compared to established Linux distributions, which could hinder its application in physics simulations. This issue parallels challenges faced when transitioning code between programming languages, as seen with the use of Python and Go for scientific computing. The ongoing debate within the Linux community revolves around the potential for rewriting Linux in Rust versus maintaining its C foundation.
Woolford180
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Has anyone heard of this OS and/or used it? I am curious how it holds up to Linux for use in physics.
I have come across an new Unix-based OS that uses a micro-kernel architecture and is written in Rust (https://www.redox-os.org/). Has anyone heard of this OS and/or used it? I am curious how it holds up to Linux for use in physics.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
No, however, there is a schism in the Linux community over rewriting Linux in Rust vs. keeping it in its original C base.

I did find this glowing review:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/redox...d-you-should-try-it-despite-what-its-missing/

It looks like it's on the bleeding edge right now. It's fun to play with, but not to rely on just yet.

Their FAQ says a lot as well. Started in 2015 but still considered alpha/beta and not yet at 1.0 release level yet.

https://www.redox-os.org/faq/#what-is-redox

One thing about new OS platforms is their reach regarding support libraries. Many established Linux distros have extensive math libraries, but this new OS may have only a fraction of them ported over. This could prevent you from doing meaningful physics simulations.

This same dilemma arises with languages, too. I had heard folks prototype new stuff in Python using Numpy support but then move it to Go, aka Golang programming, for production. Go has a similar library called Gonum, but it needs some essential functions that one must write from scratch to complete a port.

I've done some physics simulations using Java-based Open Source Physics, but they are strictly in Java. If I wanted to do them in any other language, I'd have to port the OSP code over.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
jedishrfu said:
there is a schism in the Linux community
That is an invariant.
 
LLMs and AIs have a bad reputation at PF, and I share this opinion. I have seen too much nonsense they produced, and too many "independent researchers" who weren't so independent after all, since they used them. And then there is a simple question: If we had to check their results anyway, why would we use them in the first place? In fact, their use is forbidden by the rules. I tend to interpret the reason for this rule because nobody wants to talk to a machine via PF. Those who want to can...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
19K
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K