Has Doctor Who Jumped the Shark?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheOldHag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doctor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether the television series Doctor Who has "jumped the shark," a term used to indicate a decline in quality or creativity. Participants explore various aspects of the show's evolution, particularly focusing on the portrayal of the 11th Doctor, Matt Smith, and the changes in writing and tone throughout different eras of the series.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express dissatisfaction with Matt Smith's portrayal, suggesting that the show has become overly silly and a caricature of its former self.
  • Others argue that the show has not jumped the shark, citing that it remains a children's program and should not be held to the standards of serious science fiction.
  • A few participants mention their preference for earlier Doctors, such as William Hartnell and Tom Baker, attributing their enjoyment to different writing styles and character portrayals.
  • There is a discussion about the balance of silliness in the show, with some noting that earlier Doctors also introduced elements of humor and eccentricity.
  • One participant suggests that the show has not permanently declined due to its inherent inconsistency, making it difficult to define a point of no return.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for a new showrunner to revitalize the series, with some expressing skepticism about the potential for a reboot.
  • Participants question the definition of "jumping the shark," with examples of implausible scenarios in the show being discussed as part of its charm.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no consensus on whether the show has jumped the shark. Some believe it has, while others maintain that it has not, leading to a lively debate with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various eras of Doctor Who and the impact of different showrunners and writing styles on the series. There is an acknowledgment of the show's long history and the subjective nature of its appeal.

TheOldHag
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
I've been a big fan of Doctor Who but not particularly the 11th Doctor, Matt Smith. It seems to me Doctor Who may have jumped the shark when he rebooted the universe. It seems they have over emphasized some aspects of the traditional Doctor Who to grotesque proportions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheOldHag said:
I've been a big fan of Doctor Who but not particularly the 11th Doctor, Matt Smith. It seems to me Doctor Who may have jumped the shark when he rebooted the universe. It seems they have over emphasized some aspects of the traditional Doctor Who to grotesque proportions.
Huh?? What do you regard as "traditional Dr Who"? William Hartnell?

I rather liked Matt Smith -- more than David Tennant. I would have said they "jumped the shark" when Rose Tyler (Billie Piper) departed. Couldn't stand Donna Noble (Catherine Tate).

TBH, I wish they'd bring back a companion like Leela (Louise Jameson). :blushing:
 
I prefer William Hartnell, Jon Pertwee, Tom Baker, Peter Davison and David Tennant all beyond Matt Smith. Primarily because of the writing with respect to Matt Smith. I just think they have gone overboard on some of the cheese factor and have turned Doctor Who into a bit of a caricature.
 
Has Dr Who jumped the shark...

I'd have to say no. at least in my opinion it hasn't.

Will it ever, I don't know.

One thing many people seem to forget is that DR who is a Children's program (technically Family Horror) in the UK, and holding it the standard of a serious science fiction show is a mistake.
 
TheOldHag said:
I prefer William Hartnell, Jon Pertwee, Tom Baker, Peter Davison and David Tennant all beyond Matt Smith. Primarily because of the writing with respect to Matt Smith. I just think they have gone overboard on some of the cheese factor and have turned Doctor Who into a bit of a caricature.

I agree that Smith has increased the silly quotient of the show quite heavily. But has the show jumped the shark...I think not. Anything after Tennant and RTD is going to look slightly lackluster. Yes, there has been some overt display of eccentricity which before was simply a layer of the painting but it also has had some excellent plot devices and support from background characters.

The one thing I don't like about the 11th is he's too brash and too cocksure, yes, the 10th was confident of himself too but he didn't have that 'come at me if you dare' kind of attitude:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ecycHAZtaM‎
(yes, I like the speech; its just that it doesn't fit well with the character)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Anyone have any idea about 'Who nose'?
 
Enigman said:
I agree that Smith has increased the silly quotient of the show quite heavily.
I thought Patrick Troughton increased the silliness of the show quite heavily when he took over from WH. And I was a kid back then -- I was quite indignant that my beloved "serious" show had gone silly. :smile:
 
I really don't think it's been a children's programme for a very long time.


Nimbian said:
Has Dr Who jumped the shark...

I'd have to say no. at least in my opinion it hasn't.

Will it ever, I don't know.

One thing many people seem to forget is that DR who is a Children's program (technically Family Horror) in the UK, and holding it the standard of a serious science fiction show is a mistake.
 
Kepler20f said:
I really don't think it's been a children's programme for a very long time.
Yeah. If one wants a children's program, try the "K-9" spinoff. :smile:
 
strangerep said:
Yeah. If one wants a children's program, try the "K-9" spinoff. :smile:

I agree, it is not a children's show. Perhaps some don't regard it as serious science fiction because it has other elements besides science fiction. I don't think all science fiction has to be like Star Trek. I take it seriously - thank you.

On the other hand the Matt Smith Doctor Who can be pretty silly.
 
  • #10
Doctor Who has not jumped the shark, it has begun playing on the event horizon of suck but has not crossed it yet. What needs to happen is there needs to be a new showrunner brought in, one who preferably isn't a fanboy, to set things straight. If it does cross that event horizon the only hope it has would be to completely reboot itself I believe, unlikely.

The fortunate thing about Doctor Who is that it is so inconsistent that it is hard to permanently jump the shark.
 
  • #11
Its true. how do you define jumping the shark when nearly every episode has something impossible happening. In one episode the doctor casually mentioned how his race Invented Black holes. in another the Dalleks scooped up a dozen different planets teleported them across the universe and stuffed them all within spitting distance of each other, with no harm to any of the inhabitants.

I think Jumping the Shark for this show would be having the doctor solve a mundane crime without any techno babble or sonic screwdriver :D
 
  • #12
Personally, I think Dr. Who has gone downhill ever since Tom Baker. My personal favorites have always been Baker and Pertwee.
 
  • #13
HallsofIvy said:
Personally, I think Dr. Who has gone downhill ever since Tom Baker.
Is the rumour true that Tom tended to "fondle" his female companion actresses off-camera? :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K