Has Ghost Hunters Found Real Paranormal Evidence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scifi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critically evaluates the credibility of the television show "Ghost Hunters," questioning the validity of its paranormal evidence. Participants express skepticism about the show's claims, noting that despite its frequent assertions of capturing ghostly phenomena, there is a lack of scientifically acceptable evidence. The conversation highlights the challenges in defining what constitutes credible evidence for transient events like ghost sightings, with references to the scientific community's acceptance of phenomena such as ball lightning without definitive proof. Overall, the consensus leans towards the belief that "Ghost Hunters" often presents staged or exaggerated content to attract viewers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of paranormal investigation techniques
  • Familiarity with the concept of electromagnetic phenomena
  • Knowledge of scientific evidence standards and skepticism
  • Awareness of media influence on public perception of paranormal claims
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific basis for electromagnetic fields and their relation to paranormal claims
  • Explore the history and methodology of paranormal investigations
  • Study the concept of extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence
  • Examine case studies of alleged paranormal phenomena, including ball lightning
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for skeptics, paranormal investigators, media analysts, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and supernatural claims.

  • #31
harrylin said:
Certainly not (what was unclear about my writing??): My argument presupposes nothing (indeed, that would be highly unscientific); however I'm extremely skeptical about it. Currently my bet is that paranormal or supernatural are NOT the truth. But I'm open to change my mind about it. :-p

Just the same as good ole' Randi! The only difference between you and Randi id that he went out and raised a million bucks for the sole purpose of enticing someone to prove him wrong. Randi isn't a scientist himself, he has very good scientific training, and a relatively strong background, but he still relies on universities and laboratories to test the claimants of his prize. The JREF only does preliminary screening to same time and money. They have a few YouTube videos of some of the preliminary tests.

A lot of the claimants are scared off by a simple document they must sign. All of the tests are to be video taped and must be made available for public scrutiny regardless of the outcome. No matter how poorly they perform, the results are available for everyone to see. This caused quite a stink in the "woo-woo" community. A team of dowsers were the ones who first complained about this: they only wanted results released if they were successful. As a result Randi didn't allow them to be tested. I happen to think this is fair, but a lot of people don't. It is the largest sticking point for many psychics, crystal healers, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
FlexGunship said:
... A lot of the claimants are scared off by a simple document they must sign. ...
I think that's part of it. Even more so, in my opinion, is the mutually agreed upon test protocol. Typically, a person makes some claim of "supernatural" ability, says they want to take the "Million Dollar Challenge", and they submit the http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge/challenge-application.html" . That's when negotiations begin on the test protocol, and shortly thereafter, when they discover that all the tricks they planned to use are already known and excluded, most applicants fade away.

This is sometimes followed by the applicant complaining that the test is unfair, that the JREF is cheating (?), that the million dollars doesn't really exist, and so on. The http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=43" has quite a few examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
pantaz said:
This is sometimes followed by the applicant complaining that the test is unfair, that the JREF is cheating (?), that the million dollars doesn't really exist, and so on. The http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=43" has quite a few examples.

I love the claim that the money doesn't exist. As though that would somehow redeem them in the process.

"Why aren't you proving to the world that psychic powers exist? You could win a million dollars from the JREF."

"The money doesn't exist."

"Okay... the Nobel f**king prize?"

"Uh... money doesn't exist?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
61K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K