Has Ghost Hunters Found Real Paranormal Evidence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scifi
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the credibility of the show "Ghost Hunters" and its claims of paranormal evidence. Critics express skepticism about the show's findings, suggesting that it often presents unconvincing evidence and relies on sensationalism to compete with other paranormal shows. There is a debate about what constitutes acceptable evidence for ghost claims, with some arguing that while the evidence presented by "Ghost Hunters" is not scientifically rigorous, it does not rule out the possibility of unexplained phenomena. The conversation also touches on the role of skeptics like James Randi, who offers a monetary challenge for proof of the paranormal, highlighting the tension between anecdotal evidence and scientific validation. Overall, the thread reflects a broader skepticism towards ghost hunting shows and the nature of evidence in paranormal investigations.
  • #31
harrylin said:
Certainly not (what was unclear about my writing??): My argument presupposes nothing (indeed, that would be highly unscientific); however I'm extremely skeptical about it. Currently my bet is that paranormal or supernatural are NOT the truth. But I'm open to change my mind about it. :-p

Just the same as good ole' Randi! The only difference between you and Randi id that he went out and raised a million bucks for the sole purpose of enticing someone to prove him wrong. Randi isn't a scientist himself, he has very good scientific training, and a relatively strong background, but he still relies on universities and laboratories to test the claimants of his prize. The JREF only does preliminary screening to same time and money. They have a few YouTube videos of some of the preliminary tests.

A lot of the claimants are scared off by a simple document they must sign. All of the tests are to be video taped and must be made available for public scrutiny regardless of the outcome. No matter how poorly they perform, the results are available for everyone to see. This caused quite a stink in the "woo-woo" community. A team of dowsers were the ones who first complained about this: they only wanted results released if they were successful. As a result Randi didn't allow them to be tested. I happen to think this is fair, but a lot of people don't. It is the largest sticking point for many psychics, crystal healers, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
FlexGunship said:
... A lot of the claimants are scared off by a simple document they must sign. ...
I think that's part of it. Even more so, in my opinion, is the mutually agreed upon test protocol. Typically, a person makes some claim of "supernatural" ability, says they want to take the "Million Dollar Challenge", and they submit the http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge/challenge-application.html" . That's when negotiations begin on the test protocol, and shortly thereafter, when they discover that all the tricks they planned to use are already known and excluded, most applicants fade away.

This is sometimes followed by the applicant complaining that the test is unfair, that the JREF is cheating (?), that the million dollars doesn't really exist, and so on. The http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=43" has quite a few examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
pantaz said:
This is sometimes followed by the applicant complaining that the test is unfair, that the JREF is cheating (?), that the million dollars doesn't really exist, and so on. The http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=43" has quite a few examples.

I love the claim that the money doesn't exist. As though that would somehow redeem them in the process.

"Why aren't you proving to the world that psychic powers exist? You could win a million dollars from the JREF."

"The money doesn't exist."

"Okay... the Nobel f**king prize?"

"Uh... money doesn't exist?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
101
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
60K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
28K