A Has Hilbert transform ever been used in Quantum Theory?

mad mathematician
Messages
104
Reaction score
15
Anyone knows if this transform ever been used in QT directly?

I just had seen it in one advanced course in complex analysis which I failed and in singals analysis courses in EE.
But in all the books and courses in QT never I had seen this transform being used.

Perhaps in Quantum Control theory...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In scattering theory, when you consider the so-called (complex-valued) Jost functions ##F_l(k)##, the dispersion relations relate the real and the imaginary parts of ##F_l(k) -1##. And the specific form of these relations make each the Hilbert transforms of the other. Just google for Jost functions and dispersion relations.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd and pines-demon
I used it once in a perturbation expansion of a unitary operator. It was somewhat simpler than the usual expansion of the complex exponential. But I forgot the details.
 
mad mathematician said:
Anyone knows if this transform ever been used in QT directly?

I just had seen it in one advanced course in complex analysis which I failed and in singals analysis courses in EE.
But in all the books and courses in QT never I had seen this transform being used.

Perhaps in Quantum Control theory...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform
The Kramers Kronig relations in (quantum) optics.

Edit: Looks like the KK relations are used for almost everything:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramers–Kronig_relations
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen and pines-demon
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top