MHB Have you tried using the double angle formula for cosine?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation involving the sum of cosine to the fourth power. The original poster struggles with the equation and expresses frustration over encountering sine and cosine terms that complicate the proof. A user suggests using the power reduction formula for cosine to simplify the summation. This method proves effective, leading to a positive response from the original poster, who thanks the user for the helpful suggestion. The exchange highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematical discussions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Please consider the following equation:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n}\cos^4\left(\frac{k\pi}{2n+1} \right)=\frac{6n-5}{16}$

For this particular equation, which I am trying to prove is true, I have found no way to crack it, even if I let $n=2$ and begin to try to combine the terms together, I end up with the annoying terms $\displaystyle \sin \frac {\pi}{10}$ and $\displaystyle \cos \frac {\pi}{10}$ and I am quite certain that this is not the way to go.

I have referred back to Opalg's great posts at this site to search for ideas, but also to no avail...

Any suggestions are welcome to help me to work this problem.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Please consider the following equation:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n}\cos^4\left(\frac{k\pi}{2n+1} \right)=\frac{6n-5}{16}$

For this particular equation, which I am trying to prove is true, I have found no way to crack it, even if I let $n=2$ and begin to try to combine the terms together, I end up with the annoying terms $\displaystyle \sin \frac {\pi}{10}$ and $\displaystyle \cos \frac {\pi}{10}$ and I am quite certain that this is not the way to go.

I have referred back to Opalg's great posts at this site to search for ideas, but also to no avail...

Any suggestions are welcome to help me to work this problem.

Thanks in advance.


Hi anemone, :)

Here's a method that I thought of. This may not be the most elegant method however. :)

Use the power reduction formula for the cosine inside the summation.

\[\sum_{k=1}^{n}\cos^4\theta = \sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{3 + 4 \cos 2\theta + \cos 4\theta}{8}\right)=\frac{3}{8}\sum_{k=1}^{n}1+ \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\cos{2\theta}+\frac{1}{8}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\cos{4\theta}\]

where \(\displaystyle\theta=\frac{k\pi}{2n+1}.\)

Then use Lagrange's trigonometric identity for each summation.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Hi Sudharaka,

Wow, your suggestion works great!(Smile)

Thank you so much!:D

-anemone
 
anemone said:
Hi Sudharaka,

Wow, your suggestion works great!(Smile)

Thank you so much!:D

-anemone

You are welcome! Nice to hear that it works; I never actually tried it. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top