Having trouble deciding between CFD and physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter creepypasta13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cfd Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for pursuing graduate studies in either computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or condensed matter physics. Participants explore their interests in computational simulations, applications in various fields, and the implications of their choices on future career opportunities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong preference for condensed matter physics, particularly due to an interest in statistical mechanics and a desire to avoid experimental work.
  • Another participant notes that CFD techniques are utilized in physics, such as in astrophysics, suggesting that there are overlaps between CFD and physics.
  • Concerns about job opportunities influence one participant's decision-making, as they seek a field with good career prospects.
  • A participant emphasizes that CFD encompasses various disciplines, indicating that the choice between physics and engineering should depend on the desired application area.
  • One participant reiterates a preference for physics over engineering, citing interest in computational aspects and specific applications of CFD.
  • Another participant reflects on the challenge of narrowing down interests and considers auditing a fluid mechanics class or engaging in research to help make a decision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the merits of pursuing CFD versus condensed matter physics, with no consensus reached on which path is preferable. Some participants highlight the interdisciplinary nature of CFD, while others focus on their specific interests in physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a lack of experience in certain subjects, such as fluid mechanics and solid-state physics, which may impact their decision-making process. There is also an acknowledgment of the importance of application areas in choosing between physics and engineering.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering graduate studies in physics or engineering, particularly those interested in computational methods and their applications in various fields.

creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
i may apply to grad schools this fall or wait until next fall to apply. I've been looking into condensed matter because i heard it uses stat mech a lot, which is my favorite area of physics as i didnt enjoy E&M or quantum as much. i don't know too much about it as i haven't taken any electives, such as Solid State physics. Based on my undergrad research experiences, I'm certain that i want to avoid experimental work and work on computational simulations of physical systems. I am certain that I want to do modeling/simulation research for my career, whether it be in academia or industry. one of my projects was materials modeling, which was pretty interesting. i also want to do something more on the applied side, such as working on CMP or lasers or whatever, not something too theoretical like string theory.

however, I've also been looking into computational fluid dynamics, which based on my research, is only conducted in applied math and engineering departments, not physics. i haven't taken any fluid mech classes, but CFD looks interesting since it involves mostly computations, not lab work. also, i like its applications to rockets, missiles, and jets. but nothing else in ME really interests me

hence, I've been thinking of just applying to physics grad schools since there's more research areas to choose from, whereas in ME, if i don't like CFD, i'll be stuck in it.

any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a quick note but there are certainly CFD techniques employed in areas of physics such as astrophysics. An example of this would be employing methods along the lines of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoothed-particle_hydrodynamics" . They use SPH in galaxy simulations, stellar astrophysics etc. So there are overlaps between areas of CFD and physics but you may have to look around a bit to dig up some of this stuff.

I have a bit more of an astro background so I just have more familiarity with these areas. I'm sure there are others who do work in similar areas who can provide some more details.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i forgot to mention that job opportunities affects the research field i want to go into. since i don't have a passion for any particular subject, but rather have an interest in lots of different subjects, i figure i may as well choose the one with decent career opportunities
 
CFD is a nexus of many areas - math, engineering, and physics. It is ok that you like computational stuff, but you also need an application area. If what you are looking for is in physics (formation of stars, geophysical fluid dynamics, etc.), then apply to a physics department. If you want to do engineering, then apply to an engineering department.
 
I'm certain that I would rather do physics than engineering since CFD appealed to me since it involved computations and simulations. Also, its applications to rockets and missiles seems interesting, but that's about the only thing about engineering I have an interest in
 
Everything is interesting. You only have so much time - stick to one and do it well.
 
I'm still having trouble deciding what area of interest suits me the most. But now I'm deciding between CFD and EE/materials science. I haven't taken classes in fluid mechanics, solid-state physics, or any engineering classes, and I graduate at the end of this year. What would help me better decide which area interests me the most? I suppose I could audit a class in fluid mechanics. Should I also try to work with a prof doing research in CFD?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K