Can applied physicists be CFD analysts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for individuals with an applied physics background to work as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysts. Participants explore the relevance of their educational paths, particularly in aerospace engineering and applied physics, to careers in CFD, including considerations of job market challenges and specialization in graduate studies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in transitioning from aerospace engineering to applied physics, specifically plasma physics, while seeking to maintain a focus on CFD.
  • Another participant suggests that studying CFD in graduate school would significantly enhance job prospects in that field.
  • Several participants assert that applied physicists are successfully working in CFD roles, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying physics over merely learning software tools.
  • There is a discussion about the lack of universities in the US that specialize in CFD, with one participant considering a focus on fluid sciences within aerospace engineering as an alternative.
  • One participant notes that a broader educational background allows for easier specialization in the workplace compared to a narrow focus from the outset.
  • Another participant mentions plans to pursue a PhD in applied physics with a focus on fluid science and plasma physics to facilitate entry into a CFD career.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that an applied physics background can lead to a career in CFD, but there are differing opinions on the best educational paths and the impact of job market challenges on opportunities.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations related to visa status affecting job opportunities in certain sectors, which may influence their educational and career choices.

HRishabh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am about to graduate with an aerospace engineering degree. I am planning to go into grad school for Applied physics(probably plasma physics), which I find very interesting. But the main reason I joined the aerospace degree was because I was interested in CFD. But since I could't land any internships nor jobs(international student so companies don't hire even with good GPA and research) I have to plan to go to grad school but I didn't find any point in doing aerospace again( you it specializes you into a particular area but I can specialize into any sector pursuing another major, like harvard has applied physics which researches on fluid mechanics) . So here is my question will I still be able to become CFD analyst after I become a applied physicist?

Any answer will be helpful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you study CFD in grad school you will be in much better shape than if you don't.
 
Short answer: yes. We have several applied) physicists working here in CFD.

A software package is just a tool and software is not hard to learn. It is much more important to learn what you want to model: you need to understand the physics of the system to know which parameters you can tweak. A programmer may know that you can tweak something, but doesn't necessarily realize whether or not it makes any sense in the physical world.
Aside from that, educations in any exact science field are more about learning a way of thinking than about factual knowledge (at least, up to and including M.Sc, PhD is a different matter).

Basically, if you are trained more broadly you can always specialize on the job. The other way around is much, much harder.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If you study CFD in grad school you will be in much better shape than if you don't.
I am thinking about studying CFD but there are not any university that specifically focus on CFD in US(or I haven't heard of any). I think specializing in fluid sciences in Aerospace engineering is another way but for me its worthless cause I won't be able to work in defense sector( visa status problems). I think I will be doing my grad school in applied physics focusing my research on cfd analysis. Thank you!
 
Veneficus said:
Short answer: yes. We have several applied) physicists working here in CFD.

A software package is just a tool and software is not hard to learn. It is much more important to learn what you want to model: you need to understand the physics of the system to know which parameters you can tweak. A programmer may know that you can tweak something, but doesn't necessarily realize whether or not it makes any sense in the physical world.
Aside from that, educations in any exact science field are more about learning a way of thinking than about factual knowledge (at least, up to and including M.Sc, PhD is a different matter).

Basically, if you are trained more broadly you can always specialize on the job. The other way around is much, much harder.

I am planning to do my phd. I think I will try for applied physics focusing my research on fluid science and plasma physics. That might help me to get into a CFD specific career. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K