Having trouble deducing 4 organic structures (High school exam qn)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deducing organic structures for a high school exam question, specifically focusing on the compounds FA10 and FA11, which are identified as a ketone and an aldehyde, respectively. Participants clarify that the dotted line in the test instructions indicates a continuation of the previous solution, while a hard line signifies the use of a fresh sample. The iodoform test is highlighted, with uncertainty expressed about the necessity of adding iodine until the solution turns orange/red. There is a request for clarification on the reactions involved in the tests, particularly for FA11, and a discussion on the mechanisms of the iodoform reaction, emphasizing the importance of having an alpha methyl group for the reaction to proceed. The conversation underscores the need for a solid understanding of functional groups and standard organic tests in the context of the exam.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Summary:: Please see picture below

Screenshot 2021-10-17 at 3.11.41 AM.png

The dotted line at Test 3 means to continue using the above solution, and add NaOH with the teat pipette. The dotted line separating tests 3 and 4 should be a hard line, which means to use a fresh sample of FA10 and perform the test. It is also known that FA10 is different from FA11.

I do not have the experimental results, which you are supposed to obtain and fill in the blank boxes. However, one can still deduce the most likely structures given the highly restrictive molecular formula; not that many structures even fit the molecular formula.

I have deduced FA8 to be CH3COOH. FA9 can be propan-1-ol or propan-2-ol, depending on whether the iodoform test (test3) gives the yellow ppt of CHI3.

For test 3, I am not sure why they want us to add I2 until the solution turns orange/red. Does this mean adding I2 in excess?

What might FA10 and FA11 be? Could someone please explain all reactions happening in the tests, especially for FA11?

Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These are all standard tests you should have learned about before being given a question like this. If you know about the iodoform test, you ought to know about the DNPH and silver mirror tests. Do you know what functional groups they are testing for?
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
mjc123 said:
These are all standard tests you should have learned about before being given a question like this. If you know about the iodoform test, you ought to know about the DNPH and silver mirror tests. Do you know what functional groups they are testing for?
Yes, FA11 and FA10 have carbonyl functional groups. It is likely FA11 is an aldehyde (hence the silver mirror), and FA10 should be a ketone (it is not FA11). However, what is happening in test 3 for FA11, which should be propanal?
 
Do you know the mechanism for the iodoform reaction? What would happen if you have hydrogens α to the carbonyl, but not an α methyl group?
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
mjc123 said:
Do you know the mechanism for the iodoform reaction? What would happen if you have hydrogens α to the carbonyl, but not an α methyl group?
No, the mechanism is not taught. We are only taught that the only way it works is if it has an alpha methyl group.
 
The hydrogens are substituted by I (hence the loss of the colour of I2). But unlike CI3-, RCI2- is not a good enough leaving group, so the reaction stops there.
(Note: I there is capital I, not small L as I'm sure you realize. Can't we have a font that distinguishes them?)
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top