Hawaii, formerly a lock for Kerry, now a Swing State.

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tigers2B1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lock State Swing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the shifting political landscape in Hawaii, particularly regarding its status as a swing state in the context of the 2004 presidential election. Participants explore polling data, voter behavior, and the influence of external factors such as military presence and environmental issues.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Hawaii, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, shows a tie in recent polls between Bush and Kerry, raising questions about voter sentiment and the presence of undecided voters.
  • Another participant suggests that Hawaii's strong military presence may influence voter preferences during wartime.
  • A participant draws a comparison between Hawaii and Alaska, proposing that environmental issues like global warming could sway voters, although they argue that Democrats lack control over Hawaii's climate compared to Republicans' influence in Alaska.
  • There is a humorous exchange about the hypothetical scenario of global cooling affecting voting behavior in both states.
  • A participant introduces a new business focused on a technology that could potentially reduce CO2 emissions, prompting surprise and interest from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the factors influencing Hawaii's political dynamics, with no clear consensus on the reasons behind the polling shifts or the implications of environmental issues on voter behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific polling data and external articles, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions about voter motivations or the effectiveness of proposed solutions to environmental issues.

Tigers2B1
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Gore won Hawaii by 19%, Clinton won it by 20%. Hawaii is suppose to be 'a lock' for the Democrats. So, what's going on in Hawaii? It's tied. First, it appears that Hawaii hasn't been polled in a while -- at least until these last two polls indicating a dead heat between Bush abnd Kerry for Hawaii's 4 EVs. There are only four polls shown and the first two were done on August 3rd and September 11th respectively. Those early polls showed Kerry with a safe lead. The last two are very recent, October 18th and 20th and show – first, the tie in Hawaii and then the 1 point lead for Bush. If this is valid, I wonder what’s going on to have caused such a huge swing in such a short time. While it's true that 12% are still "undecideds" --- I wonder where those "undecideds" will go. But most importantly, note that 32% of the Democrats in Hawaii say they will vote for Bush. Very strange indeed!

Link showing the polling organizations, the results, and the dates –

http://www.electoral-vote.com/pastpolls.html


Below is a related article from the Honolulu Advertiser.

http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Oct/23/ln/ln05p.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Only thing I can think of is the strong military presence sways things in wartime.
 
Hawii and Alaska aren't going to get too much "swing state" attention, regardless of how close it is. While this doesn't necessarily re-inforce my theory about why Republicans have such a strong hold on Alaska, it doesn't go to disprove it either. My theory being this: It's damned cold in Alaska, and those people want it to get warmer fast. You've got 2 parties back in the mainland, one that says global warming is a problem and must be dealt with immediately (dems), and the other who says they're not sure, and would wait before doing anything drastic (reps). My theory is that Alaskans are sure as hell aware global warming is going on, and if you're in cold-ass alaska, who are you going to vote for, the party who wants to stop global warming, or the party who won't do a thing to stop it?

That being said, the Democrats don't have any sort of control over Hawaii's weather, so they don't have the god-like power over its populace like the Republicans do over Hawaii. If only it were Global Cooling that was the problem, Democrats would have Alaska and Hawaii in their pockets easily...
 
wasteofo2 said:
If only it were Global Cooling that was the problem, Democrats would have Alaska and Hawaii in their pockets easily...

No, they would have Hawaii. It's cold enough in Alaska!
 
kawikdx225 said:
No, they would have Hawaii. It's cold enough in Alaska!
You misunderstood, I meant if pollution etc. caused the world to cool, and the Democrats wanted to stop it. That way, Alaskans would vote Democrat so as to not freeze their collective balls off anymore than they currently do, and Hawaii would vote Democrat to keep their nice tropical climate and tourism industry going. Who'd want to go to Hawaii if the weather forcast was "Cool and Windy"?
 
Ahh, now your thinking. I say we buy a lot of land in Alaska, vote conservative, and when it warms up we make a fortune.
 
Interestingly, on the topic of global warming, there is a new business, privately funded, called the Global Research something or other. They have a machine based on a theory they are testing which can remove CO2 from the air and compress it into the Earth (I assume in a solid form of some kind).

There are 3 employees to the company and they're working with $5 Million in funding. They believe if they can prove its success rate and place these giant fan/collectors globally, they can significantly cut down on greenhouse emissions globally without forcing the reduction of modern industrial techniques that cause global warming.
 
onegermanbeerglass said:
They have a machine based on a theory they are testing which can remove CO2 from the air and compress it into the Earth (I assume in a solid form of some kind).

Holy cow !

You're kidding ! :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
12K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K