Hawking Radiation: Observational Proof, Quantum Fluctuations & More

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of Hawking radiation, specifically questioning its observational proof, the nature of energy photons in relation to black holes, quantum fluctuations, and their occurrence near event horizons. The scope includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to quantum mechanics and black hole physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is observational proof for Hawking radiation or if it remains a theoretical concept.
  • There is a discussion about the behavior of negative and positive energy photons in relation to black holes, with inquiries about the possibility of the reverse occurring.
  • Participants seek simple explanations for quantum fluctuations and their implications.
  • One participant suggests that quantum fluctuations, or pair production, occur everywhere but lead to Hawking radiation only near the event horizon due to the inability of one particle to annihilate with its partner once it crosses the horizon.
  • Another participant mentions indirect evidence related to Unruh radiation as potentially relevant to understanding Hawking radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty regarding the observational status of Hawking radiation, with some asserting that it has not been directly observed while others reference indirect evidence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of photon behavior and the nature of quantum fluctuations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the conditions under which quantum fluctuations occur and the dependence on definitions related to energy photons and event horizons. There are unresolved questions about the observational evidence for Hawking radiation and its theoretical implications.

spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
2. why is that only negative energy photon goes into black hole and positive energy photon is going out from black hole? what if the reverse happens? do we have an observatinal proof for this?
3. can someone tell me about quantum fluctuations in simple terms?
4. why the quantum fluctuations happening only near event horizon? do we have any proof for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spidey said:
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
I don't believe that Hawking Radiation has yet been observed.
2. why is that only negative energy photon goes into black hole and positive energy photon is going out from black hole? what if the reverse happens? do we have an observatinal proof for this?
3. can someone tell me about quantum fluctuations in simple terms?
Take a look here for an answer to these to questions.
4. why the quantum fluctuations happening only near event horizon? do we have any proof for this?
By vacuum fluctuations, I think you mean pair production from the vacuum; this does not just happen near the event horizon of a black hole, but everywhere. However, as that article above says, these virtual pairs annihilate each other shortly after they are produced anywhere else in space. It is only near an event horizon that we get Hawking radiation, since one of the particles falls into the event horizon, and so cannot annihilate with its partner.
 
spidey said:
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
There is no direct observational evidence concerning Hawking radiation, but there is some indirect evidence concerning the (directly related) circular Unruh radiation, which has been considered explaining why ultra-relativistic electrons in storage rings do not reach 100% polarization.
 
Thank you for clearing my doubts...
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K