Heat conduction in a beam with variable x-section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling heat conduction in a beam with a variable cross-section using the heat equation. The derived equation is ρCp ∂T/∂t = (1/A(x)) ∂/∂x(kA(x) ∂T/∂x) + q̇(x), where A(x) represents the cross-sectional area as a function of lateral distance, ρ is the material density, Cp is the specific heat, k is thermal conductivity, and q̇ is internal heat generation. The conversation highlights the complexity introduced by variable cross-sections, particularly when the cross-section changes significantly, such as being proportional to x^4. The discussion also suggests considering an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks to simplify the modeling process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the heat equation and its applications in thermal analysis.
  • Familiarity with concepts of thermal conductivity and specific heat.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in heat transfer problems.
  • Basic principles of numerical methods for solving differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the heat equation for variable cross-sectional areas.
  • Explore numerical methods for solving the heat equation in non-constant geometries.
  • Study the implications of internal heat generation on heat conduction in materials.
  • Investigate literature on heat conduction modeling using stacked rectangular blocks.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in thermal analysis, particularly those working with variable cross-sectional structures in heat transfer applications.

schliere
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Say we have a laterally insulated beam and some boundary conditions at either end, be it convective or fixed-temperature, but the cross-sectional area is variable. If the cross-section were constant I'd just say it were a 1-D problem, but I'd imagine that having the cross-sectional area be a function of the lateral distance would change this. Conceptually, how would you model it using the heat equation and boundary conditions?

Or does anyone know of literature to explain this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assume that the rate of change of cross section is "slow" and re-derive the 1-D heat transfer equation.
 
Thanks for the guidance! I was able to derive this:

\rho \text{Cp} \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{A(x)}\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(k A(x)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}\right)+\dot{q}(x)

where A(x) is the cross-sectional area of the beam as a function of the lateral distance, \dot{q} is the internal heat generation as a function of the lateral distance, \rho is the density of the material, \text{Cp} is the specific heat of the material, and k is the thermal conductivity.
 
Looks like you are headed in the correct direction.
 
You might also consider looking at the limit of an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks of increasing cross-sectional area, each with length L/n. It could be you can find a simple solution based on the average cross-sectional area across the beam.

Since conduction's resistance in the 1-D case is approximated as (L/(K*A)), reducing the length of intermediate slices will linearly reduce the resistance, and decreasing the area will linearly increase the resistance.
 
Mech_Engineer said:
You might also consider looking at the limit of an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks of increasing cross-sectional area, each with length L/n. It could be you can find a simple solution based on the average cross-sectional area across the beam.

Since conduction's resistance in the 1-D case is approximated as (L/(K*A)), reducing the length of intermediate slices will linearly reduce the resistance, and decreasing the area will linearly increase the resistance.

I tried finding a solution for an average cross-sectional area but there was a rather large error, especially when using a largely variable cross-sectional area, like one proportional to x^4 (which was in the problem that made me wonder about it).

Also, that formula for resistance is based on a constant cross-section, and doesn't hold up at all when you have a variable area. I think what you're talking about would wind up being much more complicated than using the heat equation I found, not to mention the fact that I'm talking about not necessarily talking about steady state or no-heat-generation situations.
 
Well then you're off and running! Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K