Heat conduction in a beam with variable x-section

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling heat conduction in a beam with a variable cross-sectional area, considering different boundary conditions and the implications of this variability on the heat equation. Participants explore theoretical approaches and potential literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes modeling the heat conduction problem using the heat equation while accounting for variable cross-sectional area and boundary conditions.
  • Another participant suggests assuming a "slow" rate of change of cross-section to re-derive the 1-D heat transfer equation.
  • A participant presents a derived equation that incorporates the variable cross-sectional area and internal heat generation as functions of lateral distance.
  • Some participants recommend considering an approach using an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks to simplify the problem based on average cross-sectional area.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of using average cross-sectional area in cases of significant variability, particularly with complex functions like x^4.
  • It is noted that the resistance formula for conduction based on constant cross-section does not apply when the area varies, indicating a more complex situation than initially assumed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to model the problem, with no consensus reached on a single method or solution. Some agree on the complexity introduced by variable cross-section, while others suggest simpler models may still be applicable.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the rate of change of cross-section and the applicability of resistance formulas based on constant cross-section, which may not hold in cases of significant variability.

schliere
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Say we have a laterally insulated beam and some boundary conditions at either end, be it convective or fixed-temperature, but the cross-sectional area is variable. If the cross-section were constant I'd just say it were a 1-D problem, but I'd imagine that having the cross-sectional area be a function of the lateral distance would change this. Conceptually, how would you model it using the heat equation and boundary conditions?

Or does anyone know of literature to explain this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assume that the rate of change of cross section is "slow" and re-derive the 1-D heat transfer equation.
 
Thanks for the guidance! I was able to derive this:

\rho \text{Cp} \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{A(x)}\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(k A(x)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}\right)+\dot{q}(x)

where A(x) is the cross-sectional area of the beam as a function of the lateral distance, \dot{q} is the internal heat generation as a function of the lateral distance, \rho is the density of the material, \text{Cp} is the specific heat of the material, and k is the thermal conductivity.
 
Looks like you are headed in the correct direction.
 
You might also consider looking at the limit of an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks of increasing cross-sectional area, each with length L/n. It could be you can find a simple solution based on the average cross-sectional area across the beam.

Since conduction's resistance in the 1-D case is approximated as (L/(K*A)), reducing the length of intermediate slices will linearly reduce the resistance, and decreasing the area will linearly increase the resistance.
 
Mech_Engineer said:
You might also consider looking at the limit of an infinite number of stacked rectangular blocks of increasing cross-sectional area, each with length L/n. It could be you can find a simple solution based on the average cross-sectional area across the beam.

Since conduction's resistance in the 1-D case is approximated as (L/(K*A)), reducing the length of intermediate slices will linearly reduce the resistance, and decreasing the area will linearly increase the resistance.

I tried finding a solution for an average cross-sectional area but there was a rather large error, especially when using a largely variable cross-sectional area, like one proportional to x^4 (which was in the problem that made me wonder about it).

Also, that formula for resistance is based on a constant cross-section, and doesn't hold up at all when you have a variable area. I think what you're talking about would wind up being much more complicated than using the heat equation I found, not to mention the fact that I'm talking about not necessarily talking about steady state or no-heat-generation situations.
 
Well then you're off and running! Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K