Heisenberg and energy of an electron in a potential well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the ground state energy of an electron confined in a one-dimensional potential well measuring 1 nm using the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The user initially substituted the uncertainty in position (Δy) with 10^-9 m and calculated the uncertainty in momentum (ΔPy), leading to an incorrect energy estimate of 10^31 eV. After further attempts, a revised estimate of approximately 10^-21 eV was achieved, highlighting the importance of unit accuracy in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations in terms of momentum
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions and scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in detail
  • Learn about quantum mechanics and potential wells
  • Explore kinetic energy calculations using momentum
  • Review unit conversion techniques in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and energy calculations in potential wells.

CloudDreamer7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Heisenberg and energy of an electron in a potential well

Homework Statement


An electron is confined within a one dimensional potential well that measures 1 nm. using the uncertainty principle, estimate the order of magnitude for the ground state energy of the electron in the well in eV.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



i used the equality in the uncertainty principle and substituted DeltaY (uncertainty in position) with 10^-9 m . Then you have only 1 unknown which is DeltaP_y (uncertainty in momentum y - component). I got a number from here and then used it in the expression of the KE in terms of momentum (P^2/2m = KE). unfortunately what i got was sth in the order of 10^31 which is surely wrong.

Any ideas ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got about 10^-21 with the same procedure. Try again and be carefull to use correct units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K