Heisenbergs thought experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Heisenberg's thought experiment related to the uncertainty principle, specifically the use of microscopes to measure electron positions. Participants clarify that while the microscope analogy was historically significant, it is misleading and does not accurately represent the intrinsic complementarity of position and momentum in quantum mechanics. The conversation highlights that only accelerating charged particles radiate energy, challenging the validity of the microscope analogy in contemporary physics. Additionally, there is a query regarding whether Heisenberg later disavowed this analogy, indicating ongoing debate within the physics community.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic radiation principles
  • Basic grasp of particle physics and wave-particle duality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
  • Explore the concept of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of electromagnetic radiation from charged particles
  • Review contemporary critiques of classical analogies in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Heisenbergs "thought experiment"

In two different quantum mechanics books I read about "thought experiments" involving using a microscope to determine the position of an electron, which were both presented as evidence to back up Heisenbergs uncertainty principle. Are there no real experiments that can be done to test the theory? In these thought experiments, microscopes are used to detect the positions of electrons (i.e. adding a light source and a microscope to the double slit apparatus in order to determine which slit the electron comes through) and the problem is that when a photon bounces off the electron, it changes its momentum so while you've now learned the position of the electron, you no longer know its momentum etc. Don't moving charged particles produce electromagnetic fields and thus, radiate energy that could be detected? Or is that only in magnetic fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The problem with Heisenbergs "thought experiment", and which he used to illustrate his uncertainty principle, is that still too many physicists (not to say about philosophers and others) believe the microscope analogy to be the correct way to explain it. It was Heisenberg's mistake. The complementarity between position and momentum is intrinsic, inherent in the quantum objects, and does not arise due to an interaction of an 'observer' with the object we observe. A misleading analogy that was justifiable at the times of Heisenberg, but it is plain wrong to presented it "as evidence to back up Heisenbergs uncertainty principle" in 2012.
 


I thought I remembered reading somewhere that Heisenberg himself, later in his career, disavowed the "Heisenberg microscope" as an illustration of the uncertainty principle. However, I haven't been able to find a reference or quotation. Has anyone else seen something like this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
516
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K