Heisenbergs thought experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Heisenberg's thought experiments related to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the use of microscopes to measure the position of electrons. Participants explore the implications of these thought experiments and question their validity as evidence for the uncertainty principle, as well as the nature of electromagnetic radiation from charged particles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reliance on thought experiments involving microscopes as evidence for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, suggesting that real experiments could be conducted instead.
  • Another participant asserts that only accelerating charged particles radiate energy, implying limitations in the applicability of the thought experiments.
  • A different participant critiques the microscope analogy, arguing that it misrepresents the intrinsic nature of the complementarity between position and momentum, suggesting that it is a misleading analogy that should not be used as evidence for the uncertainty principle.
  • One participant recalls that Heisenberg may have disavowed the microscope analogy later in his career but is unable to provide a reference or quotation to support this claim.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the microscope analogy as a representation of the uncertainty principle, with some defending its use while others challenge it. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the interpretation of Heisenberg's thought experiments.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the nature of electromagnetic radiation and the interpretation of Heisenberg's work, as well as the lack of references to support claims about his later views.

mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Heisenbergs "thought experiment"

In two different quantum mechanics books I read about "thought experiments" involving using a microscope to determine the position of an electron, which were both presented as evidence to back up Heisenbergs uncertainty principle. Are there no real experiments that can be done to test the theory? In these thought experiments, microscopes are used to detect the positions of electrons (i.e. adding a light source and a microscope to the double slit apparatus in order to determine which slit the electron comes through) and the problem is that when a photon bounces off the electron, it changes its momentum so while you've now learned the position of the electron, you no longer know its momentum etc. Don't moving charged particles produce electromagnetic fields and thus, radiate energy that could be detected? Or is that only in magnetic fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The problem with Heisenbergs "thought experiment", and which he used to illustrate his uncertainty principle, is that still too many physicists (not to say about philosophers and others) believe the microscope analogy to be the correct way to explain it. It was Heisenberg's mistake. The complementarity between position and momentum is intrinsic, inherent in the quantum objects, and does not arise due to an interaction of an 'observer' with the object we observe. A misleading analogy that was justifiable at the times of Heisenberg, but it is plain wrong to presented it "as evidence to back up Heisenbergs uncertainty principle" in 2012.
 


I thought I remembered reading somewhere that Heisenberg himself, later in his career, disavowed the "Heisenberg microscope" as an illustration of the uncertainty principle. However, I haven't been able to find a reference or quotation. Has anyone else seen something like this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K