Heliocentric polar orbit crossing the Earth's orbit twice

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a space probe in a highly eccentric, heliocentric polar orbit that crosses Earth's orbit twice during each perihelion passage. Participants explore the implications of orbital mechanics, including dimensions, velocities, and stability of such an orbit, while considering the probe's interactions with Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the need for a probe to experience close encounters with Earth twice during its orbit, suggesting a highly eccentric orbit.
  • Another participant argues that an eccentric orbit would lead to instability due to close encounters with Earth.
  • Some participants propose that a nearly circular orbit similar to Earth's would be necessary for the probe to meet the Earth twice a year.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the Earth's slightly eccentric orbit and how it affects the probe's trajectory.
  • One participant notes that for the probe to cross Earth's orbit twice, it must have the same semi-major axis as Earth's orbit, which limits the possible configurations.
  • Another participant explains that an ellipse cannot be rotated out of the plane while maintaining two intersection points with a circular orbit, leading to further complications in the probe's trajectory.
  • Several participants express that a circular orbit is the only viable option for achieving the desired close encounters with Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a circular orbit matching Earth's semi-major axis is necessary for the probe to cross Earth's orbit twice. However, there is disagreement on the feasibility of achieving this with a highly eccentric orbit, as some participants argue it leads to instability and complications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for maneuvering capabilities to maintain the probe's orbit and the implications of the Earth's eccentricity on the probe's trajectory. There are unresolved mathematical considerations regarding the orbital mechanics involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring orbital mechanics, space mission design, or theoretical astrophysics, particularly in relation to the dynamics of celestial orbits.

xpell
Messages
139
Reaction score
16
Sorry, the title's length didn't allow me to explain this better and I need it for a story that I'm writing, if you're so kind to help me. I've been trying it hard to solve it myself but I've been unable to.

The problem looks simple but it isn't (for me): Please assume we have a space probe of negligible mass in a highly eccentric, heliocentric polar orbit (so it doesn't experience heavy perturbation caused by other solar system bodies; let's say it "goes up and down" the Sun.) I need this probe to "meet" (experience a close encounter with) the Earth twice every time it travels along the perihelion (i.e. 6 months of travel between each extreme of the Sun-focus latum rectum), like in this drawing:
heliopolar6months.jpg


Could anyone please help me to solve the following:?
  • Dimensions of the ellipse (major and minor axis and/or eccentricity);
  • Total orbital period;
  • Maximum velocity at the perihelion; and, most important:
  • Velocity (relative to the Earth) while "crossing" the Earth's orbit "upwards" and, 6 months later, "downwards."
Thank you in advance for any help! (And please move if this is not the appropriate forum...)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In an eccentric orbit, the probe would have both a shorter path and a higher speed than Earth. To make that work, the probe needs a nearly circular orbit similar to the one of Earth.

The close encounters with Earth will make the orbit unstable.
 
Thank you, Mfb!

mfb said:
The close encounters with Earth will make the orbit unstable.

Let's assume that the probe has some maneouvering/stationkeeping capability to compensate this, please.

mfb said:
In an eccentric orbit, the probe would have both a shorter path and a higher speed than Earth. To make that work, the probe needs a nearly circular orbit similar to the one of Earth.

Heck, I didn't think so, but you're most probably right... is there any formula or something that I could use to calculate that, please?

And no highly eccentric orbit that would cover the "perihelion leg" in such a time because of a very high velocity (even if the perihelion is quite far away!)?
 
Note: the Earth has a slightly eccentric orbit (0.017), I'll ignore this here, it does not change the conclusions.
xpell said:
And no highly eccentric orbit that would cover the "perihelion leg" in such a time because of a very high velocity (even if the perihelion is quite far away!)?
The perihelion has a maximal distance of 1 AU, otherwise your orbit doesn't cross the one of Earth. A circular orbit with a radius of 1 AU matches your required time, everything else does not.

There are formulas to calculate things like the time spent between two points of the orbit, and various websites show to calculate that. It's not necessary in this case.

Unrelated: to make it worse, to match the orbital period, the semi-major axis has to be the same. An eccentric orbit out of the plane of the planets with the same semi-major axis as Earth cannot cross its orbit twice.

xpell said:
Let's assume that the probe has some maneouvering/stationkeeping capability to compensate this, please.
Hmm...
 
mfb said:
Note: the Earth has a slightly eccentric orbit (0.017), I'll ignore this here, it does not change the conclusions.
The perihelion has a maximal distance of 1 AU, otherwise your orbit doesn't cross the one of Earth. A circular orbit with a radius of 1 AU matches your required time, everything else does not.

There are formulas to calculate things like the time spent between two points of the orbit, and various websites show to calculate that. It's not necessary in this case.

Of course you're right, Mfb. Silly me didn't notice on the spot that my only possible orbit is another "Earth's orbit" more or less inclined relative to the ecliptic, does it?

mfb said:
Unrelated: to make it worse, to match the orbital period, the semi-major axis has to be the same. An eccentric orbit out of the plane of the planets with the same semi-major axis as Earth cannot cross its orbit twice.

Hmm...

Just out of curiosity, would you be so kind to elaborate this a bit more please? I'm interested!
 
xpell said:
my only possible orbit is another "Earth's orbit" more or less inclined relative to the ecliptic, does it?
Right.
xpell said:
Just out of curiosity, would you be so kind to elaborate this a bit more please? I'm interested!
Draw an ellipse and a circle with the same semi-major axis and focal point on a plane. They will intersect each other twice, but the intersection points are not on opposite sides of the central body. There is no way to rotate the ellipse out of the plane while keeping the two intersection points. You can rotate around the (sun - one intersection) axis, but then the second intersection goes away.
 
mfb said:
Draw an ellipse and a circle with the same semi-major axis and focal point on a plane. They will intersect each other twice, but the intersection points are not on opposite sides of the central body. There is no way to rotate the ellipse out of the plane while keeping the two intersection points. You can rotate around the (sun - one intersection) axis, but then the second intersection goes away.
Done and understood. Thank you very much, Mfb. :)
 
xpell said:
The problem looks simple but it isn't (for me): Please assume we have a space probe of negligible mass in a highly eccentric, heliocentric polar orbit (so it doesn't experience heavy perturbation caused by other solar system bodies; let's say it "goes up and down" the Sun.) I need this probe to "meet" (experience a close encounter with) the Earth twice every time it travels along the perihelion (i.e. 6 months of travel between each extreme of the Sun-focus latum rectum), like in this drawing:

Can't happen. If it's orbital period is half the Earth's orbital period, then the orbit has to be smaller and perigee will be closer to the Sun than the Earth.

You could set up an orbit that has half the Earth's orbital period and is close to the Earth at apogee. But every other orbit, the Earth won't be there - the Earth will be on the other side of the Sun.

As mentioned, the only way to get close to the Earth twice a year is to have a circular orbit the same size as the Earth.
 
BobG said:
Can't happen. If it's orbital period is half the Earth's orbital period, then the orbit has to be smaller and perigee will be closer to the Sun than the Earth.

You could set up an orbit that has half the Earth's orbital period and is close to the Earth at apogee. But every other orbit, the Earth won't be there - the Earth will be on the other side of the Sun.

As mentioned, the only way to get close to the Earth twice a year is to have a circular orbit the same size as the Earth.
Thank you too very much, BobG. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1K ·
36
Replies
1K
Views
191K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K