Help me determine a vector that's perpendicular (with work)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is attempting to determine a vector of magnitude 3 that is perpendicular to the plane defined by two vectors, A and B. The discussion revolves around the concepts of vector perpendicularity and the methods to find such a vector, specifically through the use of the cross product.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the cross product to find a vector perpendicular to both A and B. Some question the understanding of the dot product and its relation to perpendicularity. Others explore the implications of vector magnitude and the need to adjust the resulting vector to achieve the specified magnitude of 3.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the cross product method, with participants providing guidance on calculating the magnitude of the resulting vector and how to adjust it to meet the requirement of a magnitude of 3. Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and seek clarification on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to verify calculations and the challenges faced in understanding the concepts involved, indicating a learning process that includes reviewing foundational topics related to vectors.

Blockade
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Problem: The vectors A and B together define a plane surface. Determine a vector of magnitude 3 that is perpendicular to that surface.

What I am thinking is Vector A is on the x-axis and B is on the y-axis. Therefore, the vector that I must determine, runs along the z-axis which is 90 degrees to that plain.

So, can I say that the answer is: The vector that must be determined is 90 degrees z-axis of x-axis with a magnitude of 3?

Sorry if what I am doing or saying is not even remotely close to the valid answer.

Can you please tell me how to approach this problem, maybe even go through it?

Here is a picture of what I think the Determined Vector of magnitude 3 is:
Picture URL: http://tinypic.com/r/25u16jd/8
http://tinypic.com/r/25u16jd/8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you studied the cross product of vectors?
 
Two vectors are perpendicular if their dot product is zero.
 
fzero said:
Have you studied the cross product of vectors?
No I haven't, I am still learning the basics. I will spend the rest of tonight looking over it.
 
gracy said:
Two vectors are perpendicular if their dot product is zero.
So |A|*|B|*cos(theta) = 0
cos(theta) = 0 / (|A|*|B|)
theta = arccos(0)
theta = 90 degress
I can say that the VECTOR that is perpendicular to the plane is 90 degrees counterclockwise and have its magnitude = 3?
 
I think you should rather look at cross product
 
gracy said:
I think you should rather look at cross product
LOL, yeah I am, thank you.
 
So I am not sure, but this is what I got.

First I find the cross product of A and B, since it will give me a vector that is perpendicular to both A and B.

A x B = C

And now that I have C in vector components, but from here I am lost. Do I multiply it by 3 since it wants a "vector with a magnitude of 3"?

so 3C = 3*(# i + #j + #k) is my answer?

Can you tell me if this is wrong and explain to me the correct way?
 
  • #10
So I am not sure, but this is what I got.

First I find the cross product of A and B, since it will give me a vector that is perpendicular to both A and B.

A x B = C

And now that I have C in vector components, but from here I am lost. Do I multiply it by 3 since it wants a "vector with a magnitude of 3"?so 3C = 3*[#i + #j + #k] is my answer?

Can you tell me if this is wrong and explain to me the correct way?
 
  • #11
You should compute the magnitude of ##\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{A}\times \mathbf{B}##. You can either multiply ##\mathbf{C}## by an appropriate number to obtain a vector with magnitude 3 or derive a unit vector ##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## as an intermediate step and then multply that.
 
  • #12
Blockade said:
So I am not sure, but this is what I got.

First I find the cross product of A and B, since it will give me a vector that is perpendicular to both A and B.

A x B = C

And now that I have C in vector components, but from here I am lost. Do I multiply it by 3 since it wants a "vector with a magnitude of 3"?so 3C = 3*[#i + #j + #k] is my answer?

Can you tell me if this is wrong and explain to me the correct way?
This is just about right. However, as Fzero just said, if the magnitude of C is not 1, then 3*C will not have magnitude 3, it will have magnitude 3|C|.
 
  • #13
fzero said:
You should compute the magnitude of ##\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{A}\times \mathbf{B}##. You can either multiply ##\mathbf{C}## by an appropriate number to obtain a vector with magnitude 3 or derive a unit vector ##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## as an intermediate step and then multply that.

So for the second method that you mentioned you mean like this?

A: 4i + 3j - 2k
B: 2i - 3j - 2k

AxB = C = i -12j - 18k##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = C / |C|

3*##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = 3 * [-12i - 18k / sqrt(468)]
 
  • #14
Blockade said:
So for the second method that you mentioned you mean like this?

A: 4i + 3j - 2k
B: 2i - 3j - 2k

AxB = C = i -12j - 18k##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = C / |C|

3*##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = 3 * [-12i - 18k / sqrt(468)]

Yes, that's the general idea. But with ##\mathbf{A}## and ##\mathbf{B}## as given I find
$$\mathbf{A}\times\mathbf{B} = \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ 4 & 3 & -2 \\ 2 & -3 & -2 \end{vmatrix} $$
gives a slightly different result from yours. So recheck your calculation before working out ##\hat{\mathbf{C}}##.
 
  • #15
Blockade said:
So for the second method that you mentioned you mean like this?

A: 4i + 3j - 2k
B: 2i - 3j - 2k

AxB = C = i -12j - 18k##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = C / |C|

3*##\hat{\mathbf{C}}## = 3 * [-12i - 18k / sqrt(468)]
Where did your i component go?
 
  • #16
Sorry for line "AxB = C = i -12j - 18k", I meant to say AxB = C = 0i -12j - 18k.

I forgot to go back and fix it after realizing my Num Lock was off.
 
  • #17
I am not going to lie, I find physics and things associated with the course to be very hard and that I am struggling. Therefore, thank you everyone for you guys' help.
 
  • #18
I don't think you are handling the negatives properly.
fzero said:
But with ##\mathbf{A}## and ##\mathbf{B}## as given I find
$$\mathbf{A}\times\mathbf{B} = \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ 4 & 3 & -2 \\ 2 & -3 & -2 \end{vmatrix} $$
gives a slightly different result from yours. So recheck your calculation before working out ##\hat{\mathbf{C}}##.
I also get a different result.
 
  • #19
You are right, I am going to redo that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K