Help Needed: Difficult Math Problem (3-4) Attached

  • Thread starter Thread starter daveyman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a challenging math problem related to electric fields and spherical coordinates. Participants are attempting to understand the setup and calculations involved in determining the electric field both inside and outside a sphere, particularly focusing on symmetry and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the symmetry of the problem, questioning the behavior of the electric field in different directions. There are inquiries about the meaning of variables and the setup of integrals in spherical coordinates. Some participants express uncertainty about integrating with multiple variables and seek clarification on how to approach the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the integration process and the importance of symmetry. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the integral and the interpretation of variables, but there remains a lack of consensus on specific details of the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that each student receives different input data for the problem, which may affect their individual approaches and answers. There is also mention of the need to clarify the coordinate setup for accurate calculations.

daveyman
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
This is probably one of the hardest homework problems I've ever had. Please see the attachment. The problem is 3-4.

This might be beyond the scope of this forum, but any help would be very appreciated!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, I hate this problem. I've seen it before. Okay, right off the bat you can say something about X and Y, since it is symmetric in those directions, right? Inside the sphere it should be 0 E field in the X and Y directions *I think*. Outside you have to calculate it, though... :(
 
What do you mean sigma = [02] _____ nC/m2 ?
What is the line for and why is [02] in brackets?
 
anirudh215, the sigma thing is just a variable. Each student gets a different set of input data so that everyone has slightly different answers. I usually just use the variable until the very end (sigma in this case) - then I insert the input data.

Poop-Loops - Yes, I'm sure you are right. The X and Y directions would be canceled out and therefore would be zero. So, the remaining field would exist only along the z direction. The question is what will be its magnitude?...

I'm pretty good with integrals, but I can't figure out how to set this one up. Basically, the integral needs to add up all of the vectors that point from the surface of the sphere to the origin.

Even a basic idea of how to set this up would help a lot!

Thanks!
 
Hi daveyman,

I think the general procedure is to pick a general point on the surface you're integrating over. That point (actually a small area [itex]da[/itex]) will have a charge [itex]dq[/itex]. It will have spherical coordinates [itex]\{r,\theta,\phi\}[/itex] since they tell you to use spherical coordinates. What is the electric field contribution [itex]dE[/itex] from that charge [itex]dq[/itex] at the point you're interested in, in terms of [itex]\{r,\theta,\phi\}[/itex]? (Remember to use symmetry if you can to simplify it.)

Once you have [itex]dE[/itex], you can integrate over the variable coordinates over the entire surface to find the total field.
 
alphysicist,

Great explanation! I think I'm getting the big picture now. One more question...

I've never done integration with spherical coordinates before, so I'm not quite sure how to handle it. The r stays constant, but both theta and phi will need to be variables - does this mean I need to integrate for multiple variables?
 
Yes, you are integrating over the area of the hemisphere, so it will be a two dimensional integral. (But one of them is straightforward, so you really only have to do work for one of them.)

The area comes in from the element dq, because you are given the charge/area [itex]\sigma[/itex]. If this were cartesian coordinates, you might have:

[tex] dq = \sigma da = \sigma dx\ dy[/tex]

but using the spherical coordinate area element for constant r gives:

[tex] dq=\sigma da = \sigma r^2 \sin\theta\ d\theta\ d\phi[/tex]
 
Okay - one more thing...

alphysicist said:
What is the electric field contribution [itex]dE[/itex] from that charge [itex]dq[/itex] at the point you're interested in, in terms of [itex]\{r,\theta,\phi\}[/itex]? (Remember to use symmetry if you can to simplify it.)

How do I figure out how much of the field is in the z direction?
 
The exact factor will depend on how you set up your coordinates; is theta=0 at the rim or at the bottom?

Once you have that then the z component of dF will either be (dF sin(theta)) or (dF cos(theta)). But you have to look at your angles to be sure of which one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
996
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K