Help needed in proving a number to be perfect square

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a specific number, composed of 1997 ones, 1998 twos, and ending with a five, is a perfect square. Participants explore various approaches to establish this proof, including mathematical induction and conjectures about the square root of the number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the number as having 1997 ones followed by 1998 twos and ending with a five, seeking help to prove it is a perfect square.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the structure of the number and the meaning of the counts of ones and twos.
  • A participant suggests a hunch that the square root of the number might be a specific integer composed of 1997 threes followed by a five, based on observed patterns from smaller perfect squares.
  • One participant proposes using mathematical induction to prove the claim, referencing a specific expansion involving the number's structure.
  • Another participant questions the utility of the suggested expansion for proving the number is a perfect square.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of squaring the proposed square root to verify the claim, with some expressing frustration over the need for further clarification.
  • A participant outlines a detailed inductive proof, demonstrating the steps taken to establish the relationship between the square of the proposed square root and the original number.
  • One participant acknowledges the correctness of the inductive proof presented, affirming that all steps are accurate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While there is some agreement on the approach of using mathematical induction, the initial understanding of the number's structure and the proof's clarity remains contested. Participants express varying levels of confidence in their interpretations and methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the structure of the number and the validity of the proposed square root, which may not be universally accepted. The proof relies on specific mathematical properties that are not fully explored in the conversation.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
the number 11...122...25 has 1997 1's and 1998 2's. now how do i show that the number is a perfect square? i don't even know where to start. any help would be appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what you mean by that number, or with how many 1997/1998s are in it, you mean exactly, or that's how many whole 2's/1's are in it. eg there may be a remainder.
 
the first 1997 digits of the number are 1s.
the next 1998 digits of the number are 2s.
the last digit of the number is 5.

i have to show that the number is a perfect square. i hope i have stated it clearly now. can anyone help me? thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
It's and interesting question. I don't know how to prove it but I've got a hunch that the square root of that number is the 1998 digit integer whos first (leftmost) 1997 digits are all 3 and whos 1998th digit (rightmost) is 5.
 
Last edited:
uart said:
It's and interesting question. I don't know how to prove it but the square root of that number is the 1998 digit integer whos first (leftmost) 1997 digits are all 3 and whos 1998th digit (rightmost) is 5.
i guessed that much by seeing that
[tex]\sqrt{1225} = 35[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt{112225} = 335[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt{11122225} = 3335[/tex]

but what i want is a proof.
 
Prove it by induction. Use that [tex]\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5 = 3\underbrace{0...0}_{k-2} + \underbrace{3...3}_{k-1}5[/tex] and then consider [tex](\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5)^{2}[/tex] using that expansion.
 
sorry, but i still can't prove that [tex]\underbrace{1...1}_{1997}\underbrace{2...2}_{1998}5[/tex] is a perfect square. this is probably an incredibly stupid question. but how does the expansion you suggested help?
 
You have a number. You *know* its square root. So what is the issue? Just square the number you think is the square root. Ok, so its too big to do on your calculator, but so what? Do it by long hand if necessary (and that doesn't mean write out all the digits). Alphanumeric's hint would appear to be the perfect answer.
 
matt grime said:
Alphanumeric's hint would appear to be the perfect answer.
if i understood AlphaNumeric's hint, i wouldn't have asked for more help. anyway,

AlphaNumeric said:
Use that [tex]\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5 = 3\underbrace{0...0}_{k-2} + \underbrace{3...3}_{k-1}5[/tex]
shouldn't it be [tex]\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5 = 3\underbrace{0...0}_{k} + \underbrace{3...3}_{k-1}5[/tex]?
 
  • #10
Whatever. Just square it and use the obvious induction argument that you'd already noticed in post 5.
 
  • #11
To answer your question, just square what you know is the answer. To show how it would be derived on an occasion you don't know the answer, which isn't your question, I have no idea. If that's the question, your just going for overkill.
 
  • #12
ok i think i have got it. just let me know if i am wrong. this is what i have done:

i want to prove that
[tex]\left(\underbrace{3...3}_{n}5\right)^{2} = \underbrace{1...1}_{n}\underbrace{2...2}_{n+1}5[/tex] for any [tex]n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]

this is obviously true for n = 1, since [tex](35)^2 = 1225[/tex]

next i assume that it is true for n = k, i.e.,
[tex]\left(\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5\right)^{2} = \underbrace{1...1}_{k}\underbrace{2...2}_{k+1}5[/tex]

now i have to prove it for n = k + 1. For n = k + 1,

[tex]\left(\underbrace{3...3}_{k+1}5\right)^{2}[/tex]

[tex]= \left(3\underbrace{0...0}_{k+1} + \underbrace{3...3}_{k}5\right)^{2}[/tex]

[tex]= \left(3\underbrace{0...0}_{k+1}\right)^{2} + 2\left(3\underbrace{0...0}_{k+1}\right)\left(\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5\right) + \left(\underbrace{3...3}_{k}5\right)^{2}[/tex]

[tex]= 9\underbrace{0...0}_{2k+2} + 2\underbrace{0...0}_{k-1}1\underbrace{0...0}_{k+2} + \underbrace{1...1}_{k}\underbrace{2...2}_{k+1}5[/tex]

[tex]= 9\underbrace{0...0}_{k}\underbrace{0...0}_{k+2} + 2\underbrace{0...0}_{k-1}1\underbrace{0...0}_{k+2} + \underbrace{1...1}_{k}\underbrace{2...2}_{k+1}5[/tex]

[tex]= 11\underbrace{1...1}_{k-1}2\underbrace{2...2}_{k+1}5[/tex]

[tex]= \underbrace{1...1}_{k+1}\underbrace{2...2}_{k+2}5[/tex]

did i do anything wrong? or is it correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
That's an excellent use of mathematical induction, and every step is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K