Help needed, rearranging polynomial for inverse equation

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Charij
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Polynomial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around rearranging the polynomial equation y = ax² + bx + c into the form x = ? This involves exploring methods for solving quadratic equations, including completing the square and using the quadratic formula. The context includes both theoretical understanding and practical application in programming.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on rearranging the quadratic equation to isolate x.
  • Another suggests completing the square as a method to achieve the desired form.
  • A different participant provides a specific rearranged equation, indicating a potential solution.
  • One reply recommends using the Wolfram Equation Solver for an alternative approach and verification of the solution.
  • Another participant inquires about the quadratic formula, suggesting it as a standard method for solving the equation.
  • There is a mention that without restricting the domain, a quadratic function does not have a unique inverse.
  • A participant clarifies their context, stating they are developing a program to compute coefficients and solve for x given y, and acknowledges the efficiency of the Wolfram example.
  • Another reply suggests solving for an intermediate variable if a square form is already established.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple methods for solving the equation, including completing the square and the quadratic formula, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach. There are also differing views on the implications of the quadratic function's inverse.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the need for domain restrictions when discussing the existence of an inverse function for quadratics. There is also mention of potential terminology confusion regarding the problem being addressed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about quadratic equations, individuals interested in mathematical problem-solving techniques, and programmers working on related computational tasks.

Charij
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to rearrange an equation:

y = ax^2 + bx + c

to the form of:

x = ?

I'm not entirely sure how to go about this and the examples I've found require the equation to be in a different form. Any tips or a point in the right direction would be great!

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Complete the square.
 
Great thanks!

That in mind I've got:

x = [itex]\frac{\sqrt{y - c - \frac{b^{2}}{4a}} - \frac{b}{2\sqrt{a}}}{\sqrt{a}}[/itex]
 
Do you know the quadratic formula, which is the default solution of ax² + bx + c = 0? Or is that what you are trying to prove here? Because if not, you can pull y to the other side of the equals sign and apply the quadratic formula.
 
Complete the square or use the quadratic formula.

Most people learn how to solve quadratic equations before they learn about "inverse functions". Also, at some point you will have a "plus or minus". Unless your domain is restricted, a quadratic function will NOT have an inverse function.
 
I'm actually writing a program that works out a, b and c, but then needs to work out x given y. I probably used the wrong terminology to describe something along the way ^^

The answer I first wrote was generated by getting the equation in the form of:

y = (dx + e)^2 + f

and then working out d, e and f. The wolfram example is much nicer solution though, and more efficient computer wise :)

Thanks a lot for the help!
 
If you already have a square you can solve for p = (dx + e) first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K