Help on Hubble Constant, H0, h100 & Critical Density Rhoc

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Hubble constant, denoted as H0, and its relationship with the parameter h100, as well as the critical density of the universe, Rhoc. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of these terms in cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the meaning of h100 in relation to the Hubble constant and its expression in terms of critical density. Some participants question the consistency of the equations provided and the derivation of the prefactor in the critical density formula.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and relationships between the variables. There is recognition of potential inconsistencies in the equations, and some guidance is offered regarding the interpretation of h100 and its application in critical density calculations. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the values and definitions of h100 and the critical density, particularly in relation to the equations presented. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the derivation of specific constants and their implications in cosmological models.

Badger01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
For the most part I've been using the Hubble constant of:
H0 = 72 km/s/Mpc

but I've started seeing it expressed as:
H0 = 100 h100 km/s/Mpc.

what is h100 and why is it coming up in this??

I've also seen the critical density for the shape of the universe (flat/open/closed ect) as:
Rhoc = 1.879 h1002 kg/m3

what does it mean in this context, and as the critical density is given by:
Rhoc = 3 H02/8 pi G

i don't see where you get the 1.879 from even if you do replace the Hubble constant with the above.
i'm really confused, so could some one please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That does not look consistent:

From your first two equations, it seems that
[tex]h_{100}\equiv\frac{72}{100},[/tex]
but when using that in the bottom two equations, I find
[tex]\rho_c\equiv\frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G}\sim9.74\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},[/tex]
and
[tex]\rho_c\equiv1.879h_{100}^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}\sim9.74\times10^{-1}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},[/tex]
which don't agree. This means that at least one of these equations is not correct.
 
ok, thanks for the help, perhaps i miss understood the definition of h100 or something..
 
What I find on this link: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CriticalDensity.html, is that the critical density can be written
[tex]\rho_c=\frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}=1.9\times10^{-26}h^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.[/tex]
When using this together with the value of [itex]h=72/100[/itex], it becomes
[tex]\rho_c\sim9.85\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.[/tex]
It shows that the prefactor [itex]1.879[/itex] in your equation should be [itex]1.879\times10^{-26}[/itex]:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K