About fundamental constants and vacuum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the derivation of two parameters with the same dimensions and order of magnitude from five fundamental constants, specifically focusing on vacuum permittivity (ε₀), elementary charge (e), Boltzmann constant (kₐ), cosmic microwave background temperature (T), and critical density (ρₐ). The equations presented suggest that the speed of light (c) and Planck constant (h) are also relevant, with numerical approximations provided for each constant. The conclusion emphasizes that any relationships formed from these constants are arbitrary and lack deeper significance, asserting that such numerical correlations do not yield meaningful insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental physical constants such as vacuum permittivity (ε₀) and Boltzmann constant (kₐ).
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis and the significance of dimensional consistency in equations.
  • Knowledge of basic astrophysics concepts, including critical density (ρₐ) and cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions and their implications in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vacuum permittivity (ε₀) in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the significance of the Boltzmann constant (kₐ) in statistical mechanics.
  • Study the role of critical density (ρₐ) in cosmology and its relation to the universe's fate.
  • Investigate the concept of dimensional analysis and its applications in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics who are interested in the relationships between fundamental constants and their implications in physical theories.

IamNobody
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does it not raise question to be able to build two parameters with the same dimension and order of magnitude of two fundamental constants from five parameters (other fundamental constants and measured properties)?

$$\sqrt{10\frac{\left(\varepsilon_0 e^{-2}\right)^3\left(k_B T\right)^4}{\rho_c}} \sim 3\times 10^8~m.s^{-1}$$
$$21.7\frac{\sqrt{\rho_c}}{\left(\varepsilon_0 e^{-2}\right)^{5/2}\left(k_B T\right)^2} \sim 6.6\times 10^{-34}~kg.m^2.s^{-1}$$
with
Vacuum permittivity: ##\varepsilon_0\sim 8.854\times 10^{-12}~m^{-3}.kg^{-1}.s^4.A^2##
Elementary charge: ##e\sim 1.602\times 10^{-19}~A.s##
Boltzmann constant: ##k_B\sim 1.381\times 10^{-23}~kg.m^2.s^{-2}.K^{-1}##
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature: ##T\sim 2.73~K##
Critical density: ##\rho_c=\frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}\sim 9.2\times 10^{-27}~kg.m^{-3}##
where ##G\sim 6.674 \times 10^{-11}~m^3.kg^{-1}.s^{-2}## is the gravitational constant and ##H\sim 70~km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}## is the Hubble constant (actually between ##65## and ##75~km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}## according to the measurements).
Of course, the speed of light is ##c\sim 3\times 10^8~m.s^{-1}## and the Planck constant is ##h\sim 6.626\times 10^{-34}~kg.m^2.s^{-1}##.

Besides, one can see both relations as two dimensionless numbers approximately equal to ##\sqrt{10}## and ##21.7## built from assumed independent parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any connection between quantities which are dependent on arbitrarily defined units is per construction arbitrary, hence numerology which cannot hint to any deeper insights.

Even worse, you can solve any equation system ##f_k(\alpha_1,\ldots) = c_k## with given values ##c_k## and arbitrary parameters ##\alpha_j## where the solutions are any possible arithmetic expressions ##f_i##. Existence of such a solution is trivial, and uniqueness unachievable. This alone indicates the lack of meaning.

I'm afraid we will not debate such kind of conspiracies on PF.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 163 ·
6
Replies
163
Views
28K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K