Help Solving Astrophysics Textbook Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving a problem from an astrophysics textbook regarding the relationships between luminosity (L), mass (M), and radius (R) of a star. The user initially derived L proportional to M^{5.5}R^{-0.5} but encountered issues when trying to express L solely as a function of M and R. The discussion highlights the necessity of incorporating the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium, dP/dr = -rho*g, and the ideal gas law to correctly relate temperature (T) to mass and radius, ultimately leading to the conclusion that T is proportional to M/R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar structure equations, including radiative diffusion and energy generation.
  • Familiarity with hydrostatic equilibrium in astrophysics.
  • Knowledge of the ideal gas law and its application in astrophysical contexts.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical manipulation of proportional relationships.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of hydrostatic equilibrium in stellar astrophysics.
  • Learn about the ideal gas law and its implications for stellar temperature and pressure.
  • Explore the derivation of stellar structure equations, focusing on luminosity and mass relationships.
  • Investigate the role of radiative diffusion in energy transport within stars.
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysics students, researchers in stellar dynamics, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of stellar structure and the relationships between mass, radius, and luminosity.

girlinphysics
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have a question in my astrophysics textbook that I need some help with.

Given [tex]\frac{dT}{dr}\propto\frac{\kappa\rho{L}}{r^2T^3}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{dL}{dr}\propto{r^2}{\rho}\epsilon[/tex] show that [tex]L\propto {M^{5.4}}[/tex] and [tex]R\propto {M^{0.2}}[/tex] if [tex]\kappa\propto\rho{T^{-3.5}}[/tex] and [tex]\epsilon\propto\rho{T^{5}}[/tex].

Using the equation [tex]\frac{dT}{dr}\propto\frac{\kappa\rho{L}}{r^2T^3}[/tex] and substituting the value for [tex]\kappa[/tex] and also [tex]\rho\propto{\frac{M}{R^3}}[/tex] I got the answer [tex]L\propto {M^{5.5}R^{-0.5}}[/tex]

Then using [tex]\frac{dL}{dr}\propto{r^2}{\rho}\epsilon[/tex] and substituting [tex]\epsilon\propto\rho{T^{5}}[/tex] as well as [tex]\rho\propto{\frac{M}{R^3}}[/tex] and the result from above I got [tex]M^{2.5}\propto{R}[/tex]

Obviously I have done something wrong. I'm a little slow in tex but if you would like my full working in order to help me just let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem you give is underconstrained. After substituting for epsilon and rho, your first equation gives L as a function of R, M, and T, yet you express it as purely a function of R and M. What happened to T? Also, you are told a second way to express L as a function of R, M, and T, so by equating the two, all you get is one equation involving R, M, and T, which cannot be solved for R as a function of M alone. You are missing a constraint on T. To find it, think physically about what you have already asserted about the star, and what is missing.

The equations you give are the equation of radiative diffusion, and the equation of energy generation. What you are missing is the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium, which is dP/dr = -rho*g. That brings in the pressure P, which you have to get rid of using the ideal gas equation. You should see that T is proportional to M/R, and if you put that into what you have above, you should get the answer you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K