Help understanding landau damping derivation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of Landau damping, focusing on the mathematical treatment of charged particles in a varying electric field. Participants are exploring the implications of the derivation and seeking clarification on specific steps and concepts within the context of linearized theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial derivation involving the motion of a charged particle in a 1D electric field and expresses confusion about subsequent steps.
  • Another participant simplifies the equation by introducing a variable Δ = ku0 - ω and provides a method for integrating the equation to clarify the relationship between velocity perturbations and the electric field.
  • A participant seeks further clarification on the meaning of the term u - u0 and its significance in demonstrating that particles with velocities close to the wave's phase velocity experience growing perturbations over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants are engaged in a constructive dialogue, with some expressing understanding of certain steps while others seek clarification. No consensus has been reached regarding the overall comprehension of the derivation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the mathematical steps involved in the derivation, including the use of limits and integration techniques, which may depend on specific assumptions about the perturbations and the behavior of the particles.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in plasma physics, wave-particle interactions, and the mathematical underpinnings of Landau damping.

hereboy!!
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been given a derivation describing the physics of landau damping, but i don't quite understand it. It starts with the equation for a charged particle in a 1d electric field varying as Eexp[i(kx-wt)] being determined by d2x/dx2=e/m Eexp[i(wt-kx)].

Since we are dealing with a linearized theory in which the perturbation due to the wave
is small, it follows that if the particle starts with velocity u0 at position x0 then we may
substitute x0+u0 t for x in the electric field term. This is actually the position of the particle on its unperturbed trajectory, starting at x = x0 at t = 0. Thus, we obtain

du/dt=e/m Eexp[i (kx0+ku0 t−ωt)] [1]

I understand it up till this point, the next part leaves me confused.

equation [1] yields:

u − u0 =e/m E [[exp i(kx0+ku0 t−ωt) − exp ikx0)]/i(ku0 − ω)]

As k u0 − ω → 0, the above expression reduces to

u − u0 =e/m Et exp ik x0

showing that particles with u0 close to ω/k, that is with velocity components along the
x-axis close to the phase velocity of the wave, have velocity perturbations which grow in
time. These so-called resonant particles gain energy from, or lose energy to, the wave, and are responsible for the damping.

I have attached the derivation that is in my textbook as a separate file, If anyone could point me in the right direction to understanding this it would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • landau derivation.jpg
    landau derivation.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
To simplify let Δ = ku0 - ω. Eq [1] is du/dt = e/m Eeikx0 (eiΔt). Integrating the parenthesis wrt t gives u - u0 = e/m Eeikx0 (eiΔt/iΔ). Then to evaluate the limit Δ → 0 we use l'Hopital's rule. Diffierentiate numerator and denominator of the () wrt Δ and get u - u0 = e/m Eeikx0 (it/i), which is what you have.
 
Thanks for the speedy response, very much appreciated!
 
one more thing i forgot to ask, what does u-u0 represent and how does this show that electrons with velocities u0 close to the phase velocity of the wave have pertubations that grow in time?

Best Wishes

G
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
307
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K