Help with a debate on atoms at work?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mole1811
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the debate regarding the composition of the human body, specifically the assertion that it is 99.999999999999% empty space. Participants reference atomic structure, noting that atomic nuclei measure approximately 10^-15 meters and atoms about 10^-11 meters, leading to the conclusion that most of an atom is indeed empty space. The argument presented emphasizes that if the empty space and forces between atoms were removed, the physical mass of the body would be significantly reduced. This perspective is supported by analogies such as the density of neutron stars.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and size (atomic nuclei and atoms)
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts related to density and matter
  • Familiarity with the concept of electrical forces in atomic interactions
  • Experience with scientific debate and argumentation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of atomic density and its implications in physics
  • Study the properties of neutron stars and their density measurements
  • Explore the role of electrical forces in maintaining atomic structure
  • Learn effective debate strategies for scientific discussions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding atomic theory and engaging in scientific debates about the nature of matter and physical existence.

mole1811
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Help with a debate on atoms at work?

Hey all,

For the last few hours we have been debating whether our bodies in reality are 99.999999999999% and so on empty space.

I have studied physics at GCSE, A-level and University so I'm well aware that atomic nuclei are roughly 10^-15 meters and an atom is 10^-11 meters in size, therefor majority of the atom being empty space.

My argument is that even though our bodies are made up of an amount of atoms that we just can't comprehend, if we were able to remove the 'empty space' and forces between the atoms then the actual physical mass we have within our bodies is well very small.

Is this right or am I totally barking up the wrong tree?
If I am right how can i put it to the rest of the guys in a way I can win the debate?
I have already used the golf ball example and explained how close the next physical mass to the golf ball is, yet they still sit there arguing 'i am not empty space I am solid and that's the end of it'

who is right??

Cheers all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hey mole1811! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I think you're right …

if everything inside you was electrically neutral, it could be packed into a neutron star, whose density is traditionally measured in tons per matchbox-ful :rolleyes: …

it's only the electrical forces that keep you in shape. :biggrin:

Stay solid!

™​
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Calculating Force on a Golf Ball when Putting on a Level Green
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Why do cars crash? (Instead of passing through each other)
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Undergrad How Could Rarefied Space Matter Affect a Starship's Speed Near a Star?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Graduate Newton's bucket experiment, Why the debate?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Hubble Constant: Force Acting on Hydrogen Atom Due to Expansion of Universe
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School Fundamental Questions about Atoms
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
High School How's it possible to push on systems with 2 parts? (Newton's third law)
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Loss of atoms from the surface of the material: How does it work?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Undergrad Deriving the ionization energy of a hydrogen atom
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Undergrad Ball free fall 100m at equator, where is the landing spot?
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K