Help with a proof regarding convergent sequence (proof by contradiction)

malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,431
Ok I am trying to brush up my real analysis skills so that I can study some topology and measure theory at some point.

I found this theorem in my notes, that is proven by using proof by contradiction. However, I have a hard time understanding what the contradiction really is...

Here is the theorem and the proof.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Let ##(x_n)## be a convergent sequence. Assume that there exists a natural number ##N## such that ##x_n \leq A## (where ##A## is some real number) holds for each ##n \geq N##. Then the following holds: ##\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq A##.

Proof: Assume the contrary, that ##\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = L > A##. Let ##\epsilon = L - A##. Since ##(x_n)## is convergent, all except a finite number of elements in the sequence belongs on the interval ##(L - \epsilon , L + \epsilon)##. But all numbers on this interval is strictly greater than ##A = L - \epsilon##, which is a contradiction.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I have no idea what is contradicted and why this is a contradiction. Thanks in advance for any kind of illumination on this theorem and proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The contradiction is that your initial statement is ##x_n \leq A## (except maybe a finite number of cases). But if you assume ##\lim x_n > A##, then you need an infinite number of cases where ##x_n > A##.
This is a contradiction and therefore you must have ##\lim x_n \leq A##
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
drmalawi said:
Ok I am trying to brush up my real analysis skills so that I can study some topology and measure theory at some point.

I found this theorem in my notes, that is proven by using proof by contradiction. However, I have a hard time understanding what the contradiction really is...

Here is the theorem and the proof.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Let ##(x_n)## be a convergent sequence. Assume that there exists a natural number ##N## such that ##x_n \leq A## (where ##A## is some real number) holds for each ##n \geq N##. Then the following holds: ##\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq A##.

Proof: Assume the contrary, that ##\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = L > A##. Let ##\epsilon = L - A##. Since ##(x_n)## is convergent, all except a finite number of elements in the sequence belongs on the interval ##(L - \epsilon , L + \epsilon)##. But all numbers on this interval is strictly greater than ##A = L - \epsilon##, which is a contradiction.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I have no idea what is contradicted and why this is a contradiction. Thanks in advance for any kind of illumination on this theorem and proof.
It's quite neat to do it that way. Can you do a different proof? Along similar lines.
 
I think that you should fill in some details in a more step-by-step manner.
Let ##N_1## denote the integer such that ##|x_n -L| \lt \epsilon## ## \forall n\gt N_1##. Let ##N' = max\{N_1, N\}##. If ##n \gt N'##, what can you say about ##x_n##?
Although this amount of detail might seem unnecessary, it is good practice for problems that are more complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
There's another useful technique, as follows:

Let ##\epsilon > 0##. Show that ##L \le A + \epsilon##. Then use the result (you could prove this separately) that: $$\text{If} \ \forall \ \epsilon > 0 \ \text{we have} \ a \le b + \epsilon, \ \text{then} \ a \le b$$
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
I believe there is a significant gap in the availability of resources that emphasize the underlying logic of abstract mathematical concepts. While tools such as Desmos and GeoGebra are valuable for graphical visualization, they often fall short in fostering a deeper, intuitive understanding. Visualisation, in this sense, should go beyond plotting functions and instead aim to reveal the reasoning and common-sense foundations of the concept. For example, on YouTube one can find an excellent...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
971
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
77
Views
12K
Back
Top