Help with a proof (Spivak Ch. 1, 1,iii

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof related to the equality of squares, specifically addressing the equation x² = y². Participants are exploring the implications of this equation and the necessary conditions for the proof to hold true.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the equation through various algebraic steps, including multiplication by inverses and rearranging terms. Some participants suggest alternative approaches, such as working directly with the difference of squares. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made, particularly concerning the non-zero nature of x and y, and the properties of multiplication in the context of the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and questioning the validity of certain steps. There is no explicit consensus on the necessary propositions or the implications of the assumptions made. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for specific properties of multiplication, but the overall direction remains exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the proof within the framework of Spivak's propositions, with references to specific propositions (P1 - P12) that are not fully defined in the thread. There is also mention of potential counterexamples related to the properties of multiplication in certain mathematical structures, such as modular arithmetic.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
if x^2 = y^2 then x =y or x = -y
Relevant Equations
P1 to P12 in Spivak
Note sure if this belongs in the Basic Math category or Calc & Beyond section.

I want to make sure I am on the right track here. Here is what i have so far:

[tex]x^2 = y^2[/tex]

Multiply both sides by x^-1 twice (invoking P7)

[tex]x^2 \cdot x^{-1} = y^2 \cdot x^{-1}[/tex]
[tex]x \cdot x^{-1} = y^2 \cdot x^{-1}[/tex]

and we get,
[tex]1 = y^2 \cdot x^{-2}[/tex]

Using fact that [tex]y^2 = y \cdot y[/tex] and [tex]x^{-2} = x^{-1} \cdot x^{-1}[/tex]

With P5, we can say [tex]y\cdot y \cdot x^{-1} x^{-1} = y \cdot \left(y\cdot x^{-1}\right) \cdot x^{-1}[/tex]
And P8 on the 2nd 3rd and 4th terms we get:
[tex]\left(y\cdot x^{-1}\right)\cdot \left(y\cdot x^{-1}\right)[/tex]

and
[tex]1 = \left( y \cdot x^{-1}\right) \cdot \left (y \cdot x^{-1}\right)[/tex]

[tex]1 = \left( y \cdot x^{-1} \right)^2[/tex]

we know that 1^2 = 1, so this means that [tex]\left(y\cdot x^{-1}\right) = 1[/tex]

Multplying both sides by x [tex]y\cdot x^{-1} x = 1 \cdot x[/tex]
and using P7 on the left and P6 on the right, we get [tex]y \cdot 1 = x[/tex]
Finally using P6 on the left, we get y =x

Does this work? Your input is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You used that ##x\neq 0 \neq y## which was not given. I usually try to avoid divisions as long as possible. Why not work with ##x^2-y^2=0## instead?

I don't know what P1 - P12 is, but I assume you will need commutativity, and an integral domain, i.e. ##u \cdot v = 0 \Longrightarrow u=0 \vee v=0##.
 
Last edited:
DOH!

ok let's try this again:

If [tex]x^2 = y^2[/tex] then subtracting y^2 from both sides gives
[tex]x^2 - y^2 = y^2 - y^2[/tex]
and with P3
[tex]x^2 - y^2 = 0[/tex]
and using P2 we can say
[tex]x^2 + 0 - y^2 = 0[/tex]
and
[tex]x^2 + x\cdot y - x\cdot y - y^2 = 0[/tex]
Using P9 in reverse (can we do this?)
[tex]x \cdot (x + y) + (-y) \cdot (x+y) = 0[/tex]

[tex]\left(x+(-y)\right)(x+y)=0[/tex]
Or
[tex](x-y)(x+y)=0[/tex]

If ab=0 ,then a = 0 or b = 0 (what proposition in Spivak is this? What allows for this?)

Then using the 1st term in the equation above:
[tex]x - y = 0[/tex]
adding y to both sides
[tex]x - y + y = 0 + y[/tex]
P3 gives
[tex]x + 0 = 0 +y[/tex]
Using P2
[tex]x = y[/tex]

We can do this similarly for the other term. How does this work?
 
You could shorten it a lot. I don't know whether this is a proposition or part of the P list, but it is necessary. E.g. on the clock face ##\mathbb{Z}_{12}## we have ##4\cdot 4 = 4 = 2 \cdot 2## and ##4\neq \pm 2##.
 
Which part is necessary? Also what do you mean by ## \mathbb{Z}_{12} ##
 
stunner5000pt said:
Which part is necessary?
That a product can only be zero if one (or both) of the factors is. ##(*)##
Also what do you mean by ## \mathbb{Z}_{12} ##
The clock face: the twelve hourly marks. ##4^2## are four times four hours which is the same constellation on the clock as twice two hours, ##2^2##. This is a counterexample in case we do not have the property ##(*)##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K