Help with centripetal force and friction question please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed at which a race car begins to slide while navigating a curve, considering both centripetal and tangential acceleration. The initial calculations incorrectly assumed only centripetal acceleration, resulting in a speed of 37.04 m/s, which was identified as incorrect. Participants emphasized the importance of accounting for tangential acceleration, which reduces the available lateral traction of the tires during acceleration. The correct approach involves combining both centripetal and tangential components to determine the actual speed limit before sliding occurs. Understanding the interplay between these forces is crucial for accurate problem-solving in physics.
takelight2
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A race car enters a flat 200-m radius curve at a speed of 20.0 m/s while increasing its speed at a constant 2.00 m/s2. If the coefficient of static friction is 0.700, what will the speed of the car be when the car begins to slide?

a- 31.5 m/s
b- 24.3 m/s
c- 28.7 m/s
d- 36.2 m/s
e- 37.1 m/s
Relevant Equations
fc = mv^2/r
Ff = kN
Ff = Fc
(mv^2)/r = kmg
(v^2)/r = kg
v^2 = kgr
v^2 = 0.7*9.8*200
v = 37.04 m/s

I chose option e, and its wrong. What am i doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takelight2 said:
Homework Statement:: A race car enters a flat 200-m radius curve at a speed of 20.0 m/s while increasing its speed at a constant 2.00 m/s2. If the coefficient of static friction is 0.700, what will the speed of the car be when the car begins to slide?

a- 31.5 m/s
b- 24.3 m/s
c- 28.7 m/s
d- 36.2 m/s
e- 37.1 m/s
Relevant Equations:: fc = mv^2/r
Ff = kN

Ff = Fc
(mv^2)/r = kmg
(v^2)/r = kg
v^2 = kgr
v^2 = 0.7*9.8*200
v = 37.04 m/s

I chose option e, and its wrong. What am i doing wrong here?
There is a tangential component of acceleration. What is the magnitude of the acceleration vector?
 
Chestermiller said:
There is a tangential component of acceleration. What is the magnitude of the acceleration vector?
Tangential acceleration or centripetal acceleration, its a = v^2/r. So would be, 37.04^2/200 = 6.86 m/s^2. How does that help though?
 
takelight2 said:
Tangential acceleration or centripetal acceleration, its a = v^2/r. So would be, 37.04^2/200 = 6.86 m/s^2. How does that help though?
Tangential acceleration is different from centripetal acceleration. Only the centripetal acceleration is given by v2/r. What you are doing wrong here is that you are ignoring the tangential component of the acceleration as @Chestermiller remarked.
 
takelight2 said:
Tangential acceleration or centripetal acceleration, its a = v^2/r.
Tangential means in this case, the effort that each of the driver tires make rearwards, in order to increase the forward velocity of the car.
That force consumes some of the available “lateral traction” of the contact patch of that tire.

Your response would be correct for a tire that is rolling at constant forward velocity
If the driver is accelerating hard, adding significant torque to those driver tires, they will have diminished capability to stand lateral forces of hard cornering.
Therefore, the car will slide sideways at a lower velocity than that of option e).

traction-circle.gif
 
Last edited:
takelight2 said:
Tangential acceleration or centripetal acceleration, its a = v^2/r. So would be, 37.04^2/200 = 6.86 m/s^2. How does that help though?
##v^2/r## is the radial (centripetal) component of acceleration. The problem statement says there is also a tangential component of acceleration (i.e., in the direction tangent to the circular path, normal to the radial direction) of 2.00 m/s^2. What is the resultant acceleration?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top