Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have trying to understand this excercise for quite a time, but still with no results. So I thought maybe you can help me ;P

Here is the problem. I have a function given by:

[tex] x(t)=\sum_i A_i s(t-iT-\tau_i)+n(t) [/tex]

where:

- [tex] \left\{A_i\right\}_{i\in Z} [/tex] is a random point process, which is assumed to be periodically correlated with a period [tex] Q [/tex] longer than [tex] T [/tex]

- [tex] \left\{\tau_i\right\}_{i\in Z} [/tex] is a zero-mean delta-correlated point process with probability density function [tex] \phi_{\tau}(\tau_i) [/tex],

- [tex] \left\{n(t)\right\}_{t\in R} [/tex] is a zero-mean stationary process

The covariance function os a function[tex] x(t) [/tex] defined as follows:

[tex] C_{xx}(t,\tau)=E\left\{[x(t+\tau/2)-m_x(t+\tau/2)][x(t-\tau/2)-m_x(t-\tau/2)]\right\} [/tex]

where [tex] m_x(t) [/tex] is the mathematical expectation (ensemble average) of [tex] x(t) [/tex]. For our function one obtains [tex] m_x(t)=\sum_i\bar{A}_i s(t-iT)\ast\phi_{\tau}(t-iT) [/tex]. So after substitution of [tex] m_x(t) [/tex] on the expression defining [tex] C_{xx}(t,\tau) [/tex] one could obtain the covariance function. By assuming that the processes [tex] \left\{A_i\right\}_{i\in Z} [/tex], [tex] \left\{\tau_i\right\}_{i\in Z} [/tex] and [tex] \left\{n(t)\right\}_{t\in R} [/tex] are mutually uncorrelated, one obtains somehow (and here is where I need your help, please) the result:

[tex] C_{xx}(t,\tau)=\sum_i \bar{A_i^2}[s(t+\tau/2-iT)s^{\ast}(t-\tau/2-iT)]\ast \phi_{\tau}(t)-\sum_i \bar{A}_i^2 \widetilde{s}(t+\tau/2-iT)\widetilde{s}^{\ast}(t-\tau/2-iT) + C_{nn}(\tau) [/tex]

where [tex] \widetilde{s}(t)=s(t)\ast \phi_{\tau}(t) [/tex] (convolution) and the upperscript [tex]\ast[/tex] on for example [tex]s^{\ast} [/tex] stands for the complex conjugate.

I took the problem from the article "the relationship between spectral correlation and envelope analysis in the diagnostics of bearing faults and other cyclostationary machine signals" from Randall, et. al published on Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (2001) 15(5), 945-962, under the point 2.

thanking in advance,

crimolvic

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Help with covariance calculation please

Loading...

Similar Threads - Help covariance calculation | Date |
---|---|

B Need some help with understanding linear approximations | Feb 17, 2018 |

I Help with simplifying series of hyperbolic integrals | Nov 19, 2017 |

I Help with understanding inexact differential | Nov 13, 2017 |

A Help with covariant differentiation | Jun 26, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**